| /linux/scripts/kconfig/tests/err_recursive_dep/ |
| H A D | expected_stderr | 1 error: recursive dependency detected!
4 subsection "Kconfig recursive dependency limitations"
6 error: recursive dependency detected!
9 subsection "Kconfig recursive dependency limitations"
11 error: recursive dependency detected!
15 subsection "Kconfig recursive dependency limitations"
17 error: recursive dependency detected!
21 subsection "Kconfig recursive dependency limitations"
23 error: recursive dependency detected!
27 subsection "Kconfig recursive dependency limitations"
[all …]
|
| /linux/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/ |
| H A D | amdgpu_vm_tlb_fence.c | 34 struct dma_fence *dependency; member
56 if (f->dependency) { in amdgpu_tlb_fence_work()
57 dma_fence_wait(f->dependency, false); in amdgpu_tlb_fence_work()
58 dma_fence_put(f->dependency); in amdgpu_tlb_fence_work()
59 f->dependency = NULL; in amdgpu_tlb_fence_work()
98 f->dependency = *fence; in amdgpu_vm_tlb_fence_create()
|
| /linux/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/ |
| H A D | sched_entity.c | 338 if (entity->dependency) { in drm_sched_entity_fini()
339 dma_fence_remove_callback(entity->dependency, &entity->cb); in drm_sched_entity_fini()
340 dma_fence_put(entity->dependency); in drm_sched_entity_fini()
341 entity->dependency = NULL; in drm_sched_entity_fini()
373 entity->dependency = NULL; in drm_sched_entity_wakeup()
403 struct dma_fence *fence = entity->dependency; in drm_sched_entity_add_dependency_cb()
413 dma_fence_put(entity->dependency); in drm_sched_entity_add_dependency_cb()
426 dma_fence_put(entity->dependency); in drm_sched_entity_add_dependency_cb()
427 entity->dependency = fence; in drm_sched_entity_add_dependency_cb()
431 !test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &entity->dependency->flags)) in drm_sched_entity_add_dependency_cb()
[all …]
|
| /linux/Documentation/kbuild/ |
| H A D | Kconfig.recursion-issue-01 | 8 # This Kconfig file has a simple recursive dependency issue. In order to
9 # understand why this recursive dependency issue occurs lets consider what
34 # the "recursive dependency detected" error.
39 # since CORE_BELL_A depends on CORE. Recursive dependency issues are not always
42 # easy to understand. Note that matching semantics on the dependency on
45 mainmenu "Simple example to demo kconfig recursive dependency issue"
|
| H A D | kconfig-language.rst | 123 This defines a dependency for this menu entry. If multiple
137 The dependency definition itself may be conditional by appending "if"
177 from a direct dependency or with a visible prompt.
208 FOO should imply not only BAZ, but also its dependency BAR::
342 the menu entry, e.g. this means the dependency "NET" is added to the
343 dependency list of the config option NETDEVICES.
348 be part of the dependency list and then one of these two conditions
421 dependency, but will not appear under menuconfig M anymore, because
478 This defines an if block. The dependency expression <expr> is appended
549 to describe the dependency on the compiler feature is to use "depends on"
[all …]
|
| H A D | Kconfig.select-break | 1 # Select broken dependency issue
21 mainmenu "Simple example to demo kconfig select broken dependency issue"
|
| /linux/scripts/kconfig/tests/conditional_dep/ |
| H A D | Kconfig | 17 bool "Test basic conditional dependency"
22 bool "Test complex conditional dependency"
30 tristate "Test simple optional dependency"
|
| H A D | test_config2 | 2 # dependency since BAR is set.
3 # TEST_COMPLEX will fail dependency as it depends on both FOO and BAR
|
| H A D | test_config3 | 2 # should pass since the dependency on FOO is conditional on BAR.
|
| /linux/include/trace/events/ |
| H A D | timer.h | 428 TP_PROTO(int success, int dependency),
430 TP_ARGS(success, dependency),
434 __field( int , dependency )
439 __entry->dependency = dependency;
443 show_tick_dep_name(__entry->dependency))
|
| /linux/Documentation/locking/ |
| H A D | lockdep-design.rst | 22 dependency can be understood as lock order, where L1 -> L2 suggests that
25 dependency just means the order ever happened. The validator maintains a
137 Multi-lock dependency rules:
151 validator will find such dependency circle in arbitrary complexity,
173 dependency rules are enforced:
375 likely to be linked into the lock-dependency graph. This turns out to
512 Dependency types and strong dependency paths:
519 For each lock dependency::
531 With the above combination for simplification, there are 4 types of dependency edges
535 exclusive writer to recursive reader dependency, "X -(ER)-> Y" means
[all …]
|
| /linux/tools/memory-model/Documentation/ |
| H A D | control-dependencies.txt | 12 Therefore, a load-load control dependency will not preserve ordering
46 the control dependency.
103 Without explicit memory ordering, control-dependency-based ordering is
161 "if" statement, destroying the control dependency's ordering properties.
172 destroying the control dependency's ordering:
210 ordered CPU would have no dependency of any sort between the load from
232 destroy the control dependency while respecting the letter of the
243 dependency into nonexistence. Careful use of READ_ONCE() or
244 atomic{,64}_read() can help to preserve your control dependency.
247 of the "if" statement containing the control dependency, including
|
| H A D | glossary.txt | 9 dependency" extends from that load extending to the later access.
20 address dependency extends from that rcu_dereference() to that
56 a "control dependency" extends from that load to that store.
62 Here, the control dependency extends from the READ_ONCE() on
89 on the value returned by an earlier load, a "data dependency"
95 In this case, the data dependency extends from the READ_ONCE()
100 especially true in cases where the dependency is carried through
|
| H A D | cheatsheet.txt | 31 DR: Dependent read (address dependency)
32 DW: Dependent write (address, data, or control dependency)
|
| H A D | recipes.txt | 278 against later accesses that depend on the value loaded. A dependency
280 (address dependency, as shown above), the value written by a later store
281 (data dependency), or whether or not a later store is executed in the
282 first place (control dependency). Note that the term "data dependency"
365 control dependency paired with a full memory barrier:
382 This pairing of a control dependency in CPU0() with a full memory
388 control dependency on the kernel side and a full memory barrier on
402 The kernel's control dependency between the load from ->data_tail
559 the LB litmus test, a control dependency was enough to do the
|
| /linux/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/ |
| H A D | LB+fencembonceonce+ctrlonceonce.litmus | 9 * combination of a control dependency and a full memory barrier are enough
11 * another control dependency and order would still be maintained.)
|
| H A D | dep+plain.litmus | 10 * conditional of P0()'s if-statement creates a control dependency
|
| /linux/scripts/ |
| H A D | dev-needs.sh | 14 /sys/devices and then lists the probe dependency chain (suppliers and
15 parents) of these devices. It does a breadth first search of the dependency
17 dependency chain.
|
| /linux/Documentation/ |
| H A D | memory-barriers.txt | 55 - Address-dependency barriers (historical).
189 There is an obvious address dependency here, as the value loaded into D depends
394 address-dependency barriers; see the "SMP barrier pairing" subsection.
397 (2) Address-dependency barriers (historical).
404 An address-dependency barrier is a weaker form of read barrier. In the
407 the second load will be directed), an address-dependency barrier would
411 An address-dependency barrier is a partial ordering on interdependent
417 considered can then perceive. An address-dependency barrier issued by
422 the address-dependency barrier.
427 [!] Note that the first load really has to have an _address_ dependency and
[all …]
|
| /linux/Documentation/driver-api/ |
| H A D | device_link.rst | 21 Often these two dependency types come together, so a device depends on
27 In its standard or *managed* form, a device link combines *both* dependency
60 represents a driver presence dependency, yet is added from the consumer's
82 driver presence dependency is needed (but only correct suspend/resume and
109 Driver authors should be aware that a driver presence dependency for managed
178 (supplier). A driver presence dependency is not necessary for this
194 * In some SoCs a functional dependency exists from display, video codec and
208 ordering or a driver presence dependency.
235 To prevent introduction of dependency loops into the graph, it is
246 such a device link only makes sense if a driver presence dependency is
|
| /linux/Documentation/driver-api/memory-devices/ |
| H A D | ti-gpmc.rst | 28 dependency for certain gpmc timings on gpmc clock frequency. Hence a
54 gpmc timing dependency on peripheral timings:
175 indirect dependency of peripheral timings to gpmc timings other than
|
| /linux/Documentation/networking/ |
| H A D | tcp-thin.rst | 15 dependency on the arrival of new data from the application to trigger
22 lifespan. The combination of time-dependency and the fact that the
|
| /linux/drivers/clk/zynqmp/ |
| H A D | Kconfig | 9 It has a dependency on the PMU firmware.
|
| /linux/rust/syn/ |
| H A D | README.md | 7 dependency.
|
| /linux/rust/proc-macro2/ |
| H A D | README.md | 7 identifiers and to remove the `unicode-ident` dependency.
|