Searched refs:alu32 (Results 1 – 4 of 4) sorted by relevance
21 ``-Xclang -target-feature -Xclang +alu32``. In CPU version 3, support is automatically included.36 ``-Xclang -target-feature -Xclang +alu32``.
177 on 32-bit subregisters, provided the option -mattr=+alu32 is passed for183 subregisters written by alu32 instructions or narrow loads. Instead, the
481 static int __bpf_fill_max_jmp(struct bpf_test *self, int jmp, int imm, bool alu32) in __bpf_fill_max_jmp() argument504 if ((i & 1) || alu32) in __bpf_fill_max_jmp()615 u8 mode, bool alu32) in __bpf_fill_alu_shift() argument623 int bits = alu32 ? 32 : 64; in __bpf_fill_alu_shift()646 if (alu32) { in __bpf_fill_alu_shift()754 bool alu32) in __bpf_fill_alu_shift_same_reg() argument756 int bits = alu32 ? 32 : 64; in __bpf_fill_alu_shift_same_reg()773 if (alu32) in __bpf_fill_alu_shift_same_reg()780 if (alu32) in __bpf_fill_alu_shift_same_reg()1238 static int __bpf_fill_alu_imm_regs(struct bpf_test *self, u8 op, bool alu32) in __bpf_fill_alu_imm_regs() argument[all …]
7017 /* BPF architecture zero extends alu32 ops into 64-bit registesr */ in coerce_reg_to_size() 15853 /* Its not easy to operate on alu32 bounds here because it depends in scalar32_min_max_arsh() 15903 /* Its not easy to operate on alu32 bounds here because it depends in scalar_byte_swap() 16015 bool alu32; in maybe_fork_scalars() 16018 alu32 = false;16020 alu32 = true;16029 if (alu32) { in adjust_scalar_min_max_vals() 16050 bool alu32 = (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) != BPF_ALU64); in adjust_scalar_min_max_vals() 16064 /* Calculate sign/unsigned bounds and tnum for alu32 and alu64 bit ops. in adjust_scalar_min_max_vals() 16066 * alu32 an in adjust_scalar_min_max_vals() 15993 bool alu32; maybe_fork_scalars() local 16028 bool alu32 = (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) != BPF_ALU64); adjust_scalar_min_max_vals() local 16186 bool alu32 = (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) != BPF_ALU64); adjust_reg_min_max_vals() local [all...]