xref: /freebsd/contrib/bmake/unit-tests/directive-for.mk (revision 226192822cddc30cacecd55bccb48f39c653058c)
1# $NetBSD: directive-for.mk,v 1.27 2024/07/06 10:14:35 rillig Exp $
2#
3# Tests for the .for directive.
4#
5# TODO: Describe naming conventions for the loop variables.
6#	.for f in values
7#	.for file in values
8#	.for _FILE_ in values
9#	.for .FILE. in values
10#	.for _f_ in values
11#
12# See also:
13#	varmod-loop.mk		The ':@var@...@' modifier
14
15# A typical use case for a .for loop is to populate a variable with a list of
16# values depending on other variables.  In simple cases, the same effect can
17# be achieved using the ':@var@${var}@' modifier.
18.undef NUMBERS
19.for num in 1 2 3
20NUMBERS+=	${num}
21.endfor
22.if ${NUMBERS} != "1 2 3"
23.  error
24.endif
25
26
27# The .for loop also works for multiple iteration variables.
28# This is something that the modifier :@ cannot do as easily.
29.for name value in VARNAME value NAME2 value2
30${name}=	${value}
31.endfor
32.if ${VARNAME} != "value" || ${NAME2} != "value2"
33.  error
34.endif
35
36
37# The .for loop splits the items at whitespace, taking quotes into account,
38# just like the :M or :S modifiers.
39#
40# Until 2012-06-03, the .for loop had split the items exactly at whitespace,
41# without taking the quotes into account.  This had resulted in 10 words.
42.undef WORDS
43.for var in one t\ w\ o "three three" 'four four' `five six`
44WORDS+=	counted
45.endfor
46.if ${WORDS:[#]} != 6
47.  error
48.endif
49
50
51# In the body of the .for loop, the iteration variables can be accessed
52# like normal variables, even though they are not really variables.
53#
54# Instead, before interpreting the body of the .for loop, the body is
55# generated by replacing each expression ${var} with ${:U1}, ${:U2} and so
56# on.
57#
58# A noticeable effect of this implementation technique is that the .for
59# iteration variables and the normal global variables live in separate
60# namespaces and do not influence each other.  The "scope" of the .for loop
61# variables is restricted to the current makefile, it does not reach over to
62# any included makefiles.
63var=	value before
64var2=	value before
65.for var var2 in 1 2 3 4
66.endfor
67.if ${var} != "value before"
68.  warning After the .for loop, var must still have its original value.
69.endif
70.if ${var2} != "value before"
71.  warning After the .for loop, var2 must still have its original value.
72.endif
73
74# Everything from the paragraph above also applies if the loop body is
75# empty.  In this particular example, the items to be iterated are empty as
76# well.
77var=	value before
78var2=	value before
79.for var var2 in ${:U}
80.endfor
81.if ${var} != "value before"
82.  warning After the .for loop, var must still have its original value.
83.endif
84.if ${var2} != "value before"
85.  warning After the .for loop, var2 must still have its original value.
86.endif
87
88# Before for.c 1.39 from 2008-12-21, the values of the iteration variables
89# were simply inserted as plain text and then parsed as usual, which made it
90# possible to achieve all kinds of strange effects, such as generating '.if'
91# directives or inserting '$' characters in random places, thereby changing
92# how following '$' are interpreted.
93#
94# Before that date, the .for loop below expanded to:
95#	EXPANSION+= value
96# Since that date, the .for loop below expands to:
97#	EXPANSION${:U+}= value
98#
99EXPANSION=		before
100EXPANSION+ =		before
101.for plus in +
102EXPANSION${plus}=	value
103.endfor
104.if ${EXPANSION} != "before"
105.  error This must be a make from before 2009.
106.endif
107.if ${EXPANSION+} != "value"
108.  error This must be a make from before 2009.
109.endif
110
111# When the outer .for loop is expanded, it sees the expression ${i} and
112# expands it.  The inner loop then only sees the expression ${:Uouter} and
113# has nothing more to expand.
114.for i in outer
115.  for i in inner
116# expect+1: outer
117.    info ${i}
118.  endfor
119.endfor
120
121
122# From https://gnats.netbsd.org/29985.
123#
124# Until 2008-12-21, the .for loop was expanded by replacing the variable
125# value literally in the body.  This could lead to situations where the
126# characters from the variable value were interpreted as markup rather than
127# plain text.
128#
129# Until 2012-06-03, the .for loop had split the words at whitespace, without
130# taking quotes into account.  This made it possible to have variable values
131# like "a:\ a:\file.txt" that ended in a single backslash.  Since then, the
132# variable values have been replaced with expressions of the form ${:U...},
133# which are not interpreted as code anymore.
134.for path in a:\ a:\file.txt d:\\ d:\\file.txt
135# expect+3: a:\ a:\file.txt
136# expect+2: d:\\
137# expect+1: d:\\file.txt
138.  info ${path}
139.endfor
140
141
142# Ensure that braces and parentheses are properly escaped by the .for loop.
143# Each line must print the same word 3 times.
144# See ForLoop_SubstBody.
145.for v in ( [ { ) ] } (()) [[]] {{}} )( ][ }{
146# expect+12: ( ( (
147# expect+11: [ [ [
148# expect+10: { { {
149# expect+9: ) ) )
150# expect+8: ] ] ]
151# expect+7: } } }
152# expect+6: (()) (()) (())
153# expect+5: [[]] [[]] [[]]
154# expect+4: {{}} {{}} {{}}
155# expect+3: )( )( )(
156# expect+2: ][ ][ ][
157# expect+1: }{ }{ }{
158.  info $v ${v} $(v)
159.endfor
160
161# Before 2023-05-09, the variable names could contain arbitrary characters,
162# except for whitespace, allowing for creative side effects, as usual for
163# arbitrary code injection.
164var=	outer
165# expect+1: invalid character ':' in .for loop variable name
166.for var:Q in value "quoted"
167.  info <${var}> <${var:Q}> <${var:Q:Q}>
168.endfor
169
170# Before 2023-05-09, when variable names could contain '$', the short
171# expression '$$' was preserved, the long expressions were substituted.
172# expect+1: invalid character '$' in .for loop variable name
173.for $ in value
174.  info <$$> <${$}> <$($)>
175.endfor
176
177
178# https://gnats.netbsd.org/53146 mentions the idea of using a dynamic
179# variable name in .for loops, based on some other variable.  The .for loops
180# are already tricky enough to understand in detail, even without this
181# possibility, therefore the variable names are restricted to using harmless
182# characters only.
183INDIRECT=	direct
184# expect+1: invalid character '$' in .for loop variable name
185.for $(INDIRECT) in value
186# If the variable name could be chosen dynamically, the iteration variable
187# might have been 'direct', thereby expanding the expression '${direct}'.
188.  info <$(INDIRECT)> <$(direct)> <$($(INDIRECT))>
189.endfor
190
191
192# Regular global variables and the "variables" from the .for loop don't
193# interfere with each other.  In the following snippet, the variable 'DIRECT'
194# is used both as a global variable, as well as an iteration variable in the
195# .for loop.  The expression '${INDIRECT}' refers to the global variable, not
196# to the one from the .for loop.
197DIRECT=		global
198INDIRECT=	${DIRECT}
199.for DIRECT in iteration
200.  if "${DIRECT} ${INDIRECT}" != "iteration global"
201.    error
202.  endif
203.endfor
204
205
206# XXX: A parse error or evaluation error in the items of the .for loop
207# should skip the whole loop.  As of 2023-05-09, the loop is expanded as
208# usual.
209# expect+1: while evaluating "${:Uword2:Z}-after word3" with value "word2": Unknown modifier "Z"
210.for var in word1 before-${:Uword2:Z}-after word3
211# expect+3: XXX: Should not reach word1
212# expect+2: XXX: Should not reach before--after
213# expect+1: XXX: Should not reach word3
214.  info XXX: Should not reach ${var}
215.endfor
216
217
218# An empty list of variables to the left of the 'in' is a parse error.
219.for in value			# expect+0: no iteration variables in for
220.  error
221.endfor
222
223# An empty list of iteration values to the right of the 'in' is accepted.
224# Unlike in the shell, it is not a parse error.
225.for var in
226.  error
227.endfor
228
229# If the iteration values become empty after expanding the expressions, the
230# body of the loop is not evaluated.  It is not a parse error.
231.for var in ${:U}
232.  error
233.endfor
234
235
236# The loop body can be empty.
237.for var in 1 2 3
238.endfor
239
240
241# A mismatched .if inside a .for loop is detected each time when the loop body
242# is processed.
243.for var in value
244.  if 0
245.endfor				# expect+0: 1 open conditional
246
247# If there are no iteration values, the loop body is not processed, and the
248# check for mismatched conditionals is not performed.
249.for var in ${:U}
250.  if 0
251.endfor
252
253
254# When a .for without the corresponding .endfor occurs in an inactive branch
255# of an .if, the .for directive is just skipped, it does not even need a
256# corresponding .endfor.  In other words, the behavior of the parser depends
257# on the actual values of the conditions in the .if clauses.
258.if 0
259.  for var in value		# does not need a corresponding .endfor
260.endif
261.endfor				# expect+0: for-less endfor
262.endif				# expect+0: if-less endif
263
264
265# When a .for without the corresponding .endfor occurs in an active branch of
266# an .if, the parser just counts the number of .for and .endfor directives,
267# without looking at any other directives.
268.if 1
269.  for var in value
270.    endif			# expect+0: if-less endif
271.  endfor			# no 'for-less endfor'
272.endif				# no 'if-less endif'
273
274
275# Before for.c 1.172 from 2023-05-08, when make parsed a .for loop, it
276# assumed that there was no line continuation between the '.' and the 'for'
277# or 'endfor', as there is no practical reason to break the line at this
278# point.
279#
280# When make scanned the outer .for loop, it did not recognize the inner .for
281# loop as such and instead treated it as an unknown directive.  The body of
282# the outer .for loop thus ended above the '.endfor'.
283#
284# When make scanned the inner .for loop, it did not recognize the inner
285# .endfor as such, which led to a parse error 'Unexpected end of file in .for
286# loop' from the '.endfor' line, followed by a second parse error 'for-less
287# .endfor' from the '.\\n endfor' line.
288.MAKEFLAGS: -df
289.for outer in o
290.\
291   for inner in i
292.\
293   endfor
294.endfor
295.MAKEFLAGS: -d0
296
297
298# When there is a variable definition 'scope=cmdline' from the command line
299# (which has higher precedence than global variables) and a .for loop iterates
300# over a variable of the same name, the expression '${scope}' expands to the
301# value from the .for loop.  This is because when the body of the .for loop is
302# expanded, the expression '${scope}' is textually replaced with ${:Uloop}',
303# without resolving any other variable names (ForLoop_SubstBody).  Later, when
304# the body of the .for loop is actually interpreted, the body text doesn't
305# contain the word 'scope' anymore.
306.MAKEFLAGS: scope=cmdline
307.for scope in loop
308.  if ${scope} != "loop"
309.    error
310.  endif
311.endfor
312
313
314# Since at least 1993, iteration stops at the first newline.
315# Back then, the .newline variable didn't exist, therefore it was unlikely
316# that a newline ever occurred.
317.for var in a${.newline}b${.newline}c
318# expect+1: newline-item=(a)
319.  info newline-item=(${var})
320.endfor
321