xref: /freebsd/contrib/bmake/unit-tests/opt-no-action-touch.mk (revision dba7b0ef928af88caa38728a73657b837aeeac93)
1# $NetBSD: opt-no-action-touch.mk,v 1.1 2021/01/30 12:46:38 rillig Exp $
2#
3# Tests for combining the command line options -n (no action) and -t (touch).
4# This combination is unusual and probably doesn't ever happen in practice,
5# but still make needs to behave as expected.  The option -n is stronger than
6# -t, so instead of being touched, the commands of the targets are printed.
7#
8# See also:
9#	opt-touch-jobs.mk contains the same test without the option -n.
10
11.MAKEFLAGS: -j1 -n -t
12.MAKEFLAGS: opt-touch-phony
13.MAKEFLAGS: opt-touch-join
14.MAKEFLAGS: opt-touch-use
15.MAKEFLAGS: opt-touch-make
16.MAKEFLAGS: opt-touch-regular
17
18# .PHONY targets are not touched since they do not represent actual files.
19# See Job_Touch.
20opt-touch-phony: .PHONY
21	: Making $@.
22
23# .JOIN targets are not touched since they do not represent actual files.
24# See Job_Touch.
25opt-touch-join: .JOIN
26	: Making $@.
27
28# .USE targets are not touched since they do not represent actual files.
29# See Job_Touch.
30opt-touch-use: .USE
31	: Making use of $@.
32
33# The attribute .MAKE is stronger than the command line option -n.  Therefore
34# this target is run as usual.  It is not prefixed by '@', therefore it is
35# printed before being run.
36opt-touch-make: .MAKE
37	echo 'Making $@.'
38
39# Since the option -n is stronger than the option -t, this target is not
40# touched either.  Without the -n, it would be touched.
41opt-touch-regular:
42	: Making $@.
43
44# Since none of the above targets are actually touched, the following command
45# does not output anything.
46.END:
47	@files=$$(ls opt-touch-* 2>/dev/null | grep -v -e '\.'); \
48	[ -z "$$files" ] || { echo "created files: $$files" 1>&2; exit 1; }
49