xref: /titanic_52/usr/src/lib/libsqlite/test/format3.test (revision c5c4113dfcabb1eed3d4bdf7609de5170027a794)
1
2#pragma ident	"%Z%%M%	%I%	%E% SMI"
3
4# 2001 September 15
5#
6# The author disclaims copyright to this source code.  In place of
7# a legal notice, here is a blessing:
8#
9#    May you do good and not evil.
10#    May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others.
11#    May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
12#
13#***********************************************************************
14# This file implements regression tests for SQLite library.  The
15# focus of this file is testing the the library is able to correctly
16# handle file-format 3 (version 2.6.x) databases.
17#
18# $Id: format3.test,v 1.4 2003/12/23 02:17:35 drh Exp $
19
20set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
21source $testdir/tester.tcl
22
23# Create a bunch of data to sort against
24#
25do_test format3-1.0 {
26  set fd [open data.txt w]
27  puts $fd "1\tone\t0\tI\t3.141592653"
28  puts $fd "2\ttwo\t1\tII\t2.15"
29  puts $fd "3\tthree\t1\tIII\t4221.0"
30  puts $fd "4\tfour\t2\tIV\t-0.0013442"
31  puts $fd "5\tfive\t2\tV\t-11"
32  puts $fd "6\tsix\t2\tVI\t0.123"
33  puts $fd "7\tseven\t2\tVII\t123.0"
34  puts $fd "8\teight\t3\tVIII\t-1.6"
35  close $fd
36  execsql {
37    CREATE TABLE t1(
38       n int,
39       v varchar(10),
40       log int,
41       roman varchar(10),
42       flt real
43    );
44    COPY t1 FROM 'data.txt'
45  }
46  file delete data.txt
47  db close
48  set ::bt [btree_open test.db]
49  btree_begin_transaction $::bt
50  set m [btree_get_meta $::bt]
51  set m [lreplace $m 2 2 3]
52  eval btree_update_meta $::bt $m
53  btree_commit $::bt
54  btree_close $::bt
55  sqlite db test.db
56  execsql {SELECT count(*) FROM t1}
57} {8}
58
59do_test format3-1.1 {
60  execsql {SELECT n FROM t1 ORDER BY n}
61} {1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8}
62do_test format3-1.1.1 {
63  execsql {SELECT n FROM t1 ORDER BY n ASC}
64} {1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8}
65do_test format3-1.1.1 {
66  execsql {SELECT ALL n FROM t1 ORDER BY n ASC}
67} {1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8}
68do_test format3-1.2 {
69  execsql {SELECT n FROM t1 ORDER BY n DESC}
70} {8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1}
71do_test format3-1.3a {
72  execsql {SELECT v FROM t1 ORDER BY v}
73} {eight five four one seven six three two}
74do_test format3-1.3b {
75  execsql {SELECT n FROM t1 ORDER BY v}
76} {8 5 4 1 7 6 3 2}
77do_test format3-1.4 {
78  execsql {SELECT n FROM t1 ORDER BY v DESC}
79} {2 3 6 7 1 4 5 8}
80do_test format3-1.5 {
81  execsql {SELECT flt FROM t1 ORDER BY flt}
82} {-11 -1.6 -0.0013442 0.123 2.15 3.141592653 123.0 4221.0}
83do_test format3-1.6 {
84  execsql {SELECT flt FROM t1 ORDER BY flt DESC}
85} {4221.0 123.0 3.141592653 2.15 0.123 -0.0013442 -1.6 -11}
86do_test format3-1.7 {
87  execsql {SELECT roman FROM t1 ORDER BY roman}
88} {I II III IV V VI VII VIII}
89do_test format3-1.8 {
90  execsql {SELECT n FROM t1 ORDER BY log, flt}
91} {1 2 3 5 4 6 7 8}
92do_test format3-1.8.1 {
93  execsql {SELECT n FROM t1 ORDER BY log asc, flt}
94} {1 2 3 5 4 6 7 8}
95do_test format3-1.8.2 {
96  execsql {SELECT n FROM t1 ORDER BY log, flt ASC}
97} {1 2 3 5 4 6 7 8}
98do_test format3-1.8.3 {
99  execsql {SELECT n FROM t1 ORDER BY log ASC, flt asc}
100} {1 2 3 5 4 6 7 8}
101do_test format3-1.9 {
102  execsql {SELECT n FROM t1 ORDER BY log, flt DESC}
103} {1 3 2 7 6 4 5 8}
104do_test format3-1.9.1 {
105  execsql {SELECT n FROM t1 ORDER BY log ASC, flt DESC}
106} {1 3 2 7 6 4 5 8}
107do_test format3-1.10 {
108  execsql {SELECT n FROM t1 ORDER BY log DESC, flt}
109} {8 5 4 6 7 2 3 1}
110do_test format3-1.11 {
111  execsql {SELECT n FROM t1 ORDER BY log DESC, flt DESC}
112} {8 7 6 4 5 3 2 1}
113
114# These tests are designed to reach some hard-to-reach places
115# inside the string comparison routines.
116#
117# (Later) The sorting behavior changed in 2.7.0.  But we will
118# keep these tests.  You can never have too many test cases!
119#
120do_test format3-2.1.1 {
121  execsql {
122    UPDATE t1 SET v='x' || -flt;
123    UPDATE t1 SET v='x-2b' where v=='x-0.123';
124    SELECT v FROM t1 ORDER BY v;
125  }
126} {x-123 x-2.15 x-2b x-3.141592653 x-4221 x0.0013442 x1.6 x11}
127do_test format3-2.1.2 {
128  execsql {
129    SELECT v FROM t1 ORDER BY substr(v,2,999);
130  }
131} {x-4221 x-123 x-3.141592653 x-2.15 x0.0013442 x1.6 x11 x-2b}
132do_test format3-2.1.3 {
133  execsql {
134    SELECT v FROM t1 ORDER BY substr(v,2,999)+0.0;
135  }
136} {x-4221 x-123 x-3.141592653 x-2.15 x-2b x0.0013442 x1.6 x11}
137do_test format3-2.1.4 {
138  execsql {
139    SELECT v FROM t1 ORDER BY substr(v,2,999) DESC;
140  }
141} {x-2b x11 x1.6 x0.0013442 x-2.15 x-3.141592653 x-123 x-4221}
142do_test format3-2.1.5 {
143  execsql {
144    SELECT v FROM t1 ORDER BY substr(v,2,999)+0.0 DESC;
145  }
146} {x11 x1.6 x0.0013442 x-2b x-2.15 x-3.141592653 x-123 x-4221}
147
148# This is a bug fix for 2.2.4.
149# Strings are normally mapped to upper-case for a caseless comparison.
150# But this can cause problems for characters in between 'Z' and 'a'.
151#
152do_test format3-3.1 {
153  execsql {
154    CREATE TABLE t2(a,b);
155    INSERT INTO t2 VALUES('AGLIENTU',1);
156    INSERT INTO t2 VALUES('AGLIE`',2);
157    INSERT INTO t2 VALUES('AGNA',3);
158    SELECT a, b FROM t2 ORDER BY a;
159  }
160} {AGLIENTU 1 AGLIE` 2 AGNA 3}
161do_test format3-3.2 {
162  execsql {
163    SELECT a, b FROM t2 ORDER BY a DESC;
164  }
165} {AGNA 3 AGLIE` 2 AGLIENTU 1}
166do_test format3-3.3 {
167  execsql {
168    DELETE FROM t2;
169    INSERT INTO t2 VALUES('aglientu',1);
170    INSERT INTO t2 VALUES('aglie`',2);
171    INSERT INTO t2 VALUES('agna',3);
172    SELECT a, b FROM t2 ORDER BY a;
173  }
174} {aglie` 2 aglientu 1 agna 3}
175do_test format3-3.4 {
176  execsql {
177    SELECT a, b FROM t2 ORDER BY a DESC;
178  }
179} {agna 3 aglientu 1 aglie` 2}
180
181# Version 2.7.0 testing.
182#
183do_test format3-4.1 {
184  execsql {
185    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(9,'x2.7',3,'IX',4.0e5);
186    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(10,'x5.0e10',3,'X',-4.0e5);
187    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(11,'x-4.0e9',3,'XI',4.1e4);
188    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(12,'x01234567890123456789',3,'XII',-4.2e3);
189    SELECT n FROM t1 ORDER BY n;
190  }
191} {1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12}
192do_test format3-4.2 {
193  execsql {
194    SELECT n||'' FROM t1 ORDER BY 1;
195  }
196} {1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12}
197do_test format3-4.3 {
198  execsql {
199    SELECT n+0 FROM t1 ORDER BY 1;
200  }
201} {1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12}
202do_test format3-4.4 {
203  execsql {
204    SELECT n||'' FROM t1 ORDER BY 1 DESC;
205  }
206} {12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1}
207do_test format3-4.5 {
208  execsql {
209    SELECT n+0 FROM t1 ORDER BY 1 DESC;
210  }
211} {12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1}
212do_test format3-4.6 {
213  execsql {
214    SELECT v FROM t1 ORDER BY 1;
215  }
216} {x-123 x-2.15 x-2b x-3.141592653 x-4.0e9 x-4221 x0.0013442 x01234567890123456789 x1.6 x11 x2.7 x5.0e10}
217do_test format3-4.7 {
218  execsql {
219    SELECT v FROM t1 ORDER BY 1 DESC;
220  }
221} {x5.0e10 x2.7 x11 x1.6 x01234567890123456789 x0.0013442 x-4221 x-4.0e9 x-3.141592653 x-2b x-2.15 x-123}
222do_test format3-4.8 {
223  execsql {
224    SELECT substr(v,2,99) FROM t1 ORDER BY 1;
225  }
226} {-4.0e9 -4221 -123 -3.141592653 -2.15 0.0013442 1.6 2.7 11 5.0e10 01234567890123456789 -2b}
227
228# Build some new test data, this time with indices.
229#
230do_test format3-5.0 {
231  execsql {
232    DROP TABLE t1;
233    CREATE TABLE t1(w int, x text, y blob);
234    DROP TABLE t2;
235    CREATE TABLE t2(p varchar(1), q clob, r real, s numeric(8));
236  }
237  for {set i 1} {$i<=100} {incr i} {
238    set w $i
239    set x [expr {int(log($i)/log(2))}]
240    set y [expr {$i*$i + 2*$i + 1}]
241    execsql "INSERT INTO t1 VALUES($w,$x,$y)"
242  }
243  execsql {
244    INSERT INTO t2 SELECT 101-w, x, (SELECT max(y) FROM t1)+1-y, y FROM t1;
245    CREATE INDEX i1w ON t1(w);
246    CREATE INDEX i1xy ON t1(x,y);
247    CREATE INDEX i2p ON t2(p);
248    CREATE INDEX i2r ON t2(r);
249    CREATE INDEX i2qs ON t2(q, s);
250  }
251} {}
252
253# Do an SQL statement.  Append the search count to the end of the result.
254#
255proc count sql {
256  set ::sqlite_search_count 0
257  return [concat [execsql $sql] $::sqlite_search_count]
258}
259
260# Verify that queries use an index.  We are using the special variable
261# "sqlite_search_count" which tallys the number of executions of MoveTo
262# and Next operators in the VDBE.  By verifing that the search count is
263# small we can be assured that indices are being used properly.
264#
265do_test format3-5.1 {
266  db close
267  sqlite db test.db
268  count {SELECT x, y FROM t1 WHERE w=10}
269} {3 121 3}
270do_test format3-5.2 {
271  count {SELECT x, y FROM t1 WHERE w=11}
272} {3 144 3}
273do_test format3-5.3 {
274  count {SELECT x, y FROM t1 WHERE 11=w}
275} {3 144 3}
276do_test format3-5.4 {
277  count {SELECT x, y FROM t1 WHERE 11=w AND x>2}
278} {3 144 3}
279do_test format3-5.5 {
280  count {SELECT x, y FROM t1 WHERE y<200 AND w=11 AND x>2}
281} {3 144 3}
282do_test format3-5.6 {
283  count {SELECT x, y FROM t1 WHERE y<200 AND x>2 AND w=11}
284} {3 144 3}
285do_test format3-5.7 {
286  count {SELECT x, y FROM t1 WHERE w=11 AND y<200 AND x>2}
287} {3 144 3}
288do_test format3-5.8 {
289  count {SELECT x, y FROM t1 WHERE w>10 AND y=144 AND x=3}
290} {3 144 3}
291do_test format3-5.9 {
292  count {SELECT x, y FROM t1 WHERE y=144 AND w>10 AND x=3}
293} {3 144 3}
294do_test format3-5.10 {
295  count {SELECT x, y FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND w>=10 AND y=121}
296} {3 121 3}
297do_test format3-5.11 {
298  count {SELECT x, y FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND y=100 AND w<10}
299} {3 100 3}
300
301# New for SQLite version 2.1: Verify that that inequality constraints
302# are used correctly.
303#
304do_test format3-5.12 {
305  count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND y<100}
306} {8 3}
307do_test format3-5.13 {
308  count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND 100>y}
309} {8 3}
310do_test format3-5.14 {
311  count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE 3=x AND y<100}
312} {8 3}
313do_test format3-5.15 {
314  count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE 3=x AND 100>y}
315} {8 3}
316do_test format3-5.16 {
317  count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND y<=100}
318} {8 9 5}
319do_test format3-5.17 {
320  count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND 100>=y}
321} {8 9 5}
322do_test format3-5.18 {
323  count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND y>225}
324} {15 3}
325do_test format3-5.19 {
326  count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND 225<y}
327} {15 3}
328do_test format3-5.20 {
329  count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND y>=225}
330} {14 15 5}
331do_test format3-5.21 {
332  count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND 225<=y}
333} {14 15 5}
334do_test format3-5.22 {
335  count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND y>121 AND y<196}
336} {11 12 5}
337do_test format3-5.23 {
338  count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND y>=121 AND y<=196}
339} {10 11 12 13 9}
340do_test format3-5.24 {
341  count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND 121<y AND 196>y}
342} {11 12 5}
343do_test format3-5.25 {
344  count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND 121<=y AND 196>=y}
345} {10 11 12 13 9}
346
347# Need to work on optimizing the BETWEEN operator.
348#
349# do_test format3-5.26 {
350#   count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND y BETWEEN 121 AND 196}
351# } {10 11 12 13 9}
352
353do_test format3-5.27 {
354  count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND y+1==122}
355} {10 17}
356do_test format3-5.28 {
357  count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x+1=4 AND y+1==122}
358} {10 99}
359do_test format3-5.29 {
360  count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE y==121}
361} {10 99}
362
363
364do_test format3-5.30 {
365  count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE w>97}
366} {98 99 100 6}
367do_test format3-5.31 {
368  count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE w>=97}
369} {97 98 99 100 8}
370do_test format3-5.33 {
371  count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE w==97}
372} {97 3}
373do_test format3-5.34 {
374  count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE w+1==98}
375} {97 99}
376do_test format3-5.35 {
377  count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE w<3}
378} {1 2 4}
379do_test format3-5.36 {
380  count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE w<=3}
381} {1 2 3 6}
382do_test format3-5.37 {
383  count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE w+1<=4 ORDER BY w}
384} {1 2 3 199}
385
386
387# Do the same kind of thing except use a join as the data source.
388#
389do_test format3-6.1 {
390  db close
391  sqlite db test.db
392  count {
393    SELECT w, p FROM t2, t1
394    WHERE x=q AND y=s AND r=8977
395  }
396} {34 67 6}
397do_test format3-6.2 {
398  count {
399    SELECT w, p FROM t2, t1
400    WHERE x=q AND s=y AND r=8977
401  }
402} {34 67 6}
403do_test format3-6.3 {
404  count {
405    SELECT w, p FROM t2, t1
406    WHERE x=q AND s=y AND r=8977 AND w>10
407  }
408} {34 67 6}
409do_test format3-6.4 {
410  count {
411    SELECT w, p FROM t2, t1
412    WHERE p<80 AND x=q AND s=y AND r=8977 AND w>10
413  }
414} {34 67 6}
415do_test format3-6.5 {
416  count {
417    SELECT w, p FROM t2, t1
418    WHERE p<80 AND x=q AND 8977=r AND s=y AND w>10
419  }
420} {34 67 6}
421do_test format3-6.6 {
422  count {
423    SELECT w, p FROM t2, t1
424    WHERE x=q AND p=77 AND s=y AND w>5
425  }
426} {24 77 6}
427do_test format3-6.7 {
428  count {
429    SELECT w, p FROM t1, t2
430    WHERE x=q AND p>77 AND s=y AND w=5
431  }
432} {5 96 6}
433
434# Lets do a 3-way join.
435#
436do_test format3-7.1 {
437  count {
438    SELECT A.w, B.p, C.w FROM t1 as A, t2 as B, t1 as C
439    WHERE C.w=101-B.p AND B.r=10202-A.y AND A.w=11
440  }
441} {11 90 11 9}
442do_test format3-7.2 {
443  count {
444    SELECT A.w, B.p, C.w FROM t1 as A, t2 as B, t1 as C
445    WHERE C.w=101-B.p AND B.r=10202-A.y AND A.w=12
446  }
447} {12 89 12 9}
448do_test format3-7.3 {
449  count {
450    SELECT A.w, B.p, C.w FROM t1 as A, t2 as B, t1 as C
451    WHERE A.w=15 AND B.p=C.w AND B.r=10202-A.y
452  }
453} {15 86 86 9}
454
455# Test to see that the special case of a constant WHERE clause is
456# handled.
457#
458do_test format3-8.1 {
459  count {
460    SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE 0
461  }
462} {0}
463do_test format3-8.2 {
464  count {
465    SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE 1 LIMIT 1
466  }
467} {1 0 4 1}
468do_test format3-8.3 {
469  execsql {
470    SELECT 99 WHERE 0
471  }
472} {}
473do_test format3-8.4 {
474  execsql {
475    SELECT 99 WHERE 1
476  }
477} {99}
478
479# Verify that IN operators in a WHERE clause are handled correctly.
480#
481do_test format3-9.1 {
482  count {
483    SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE rowid IN (1,2,3,1234) order by 1;
484  }
485} {1 0 4 2 1 9 3 1 16 0}
486do_test format3-9.2 {
487  count {
488    SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE rowid+0 IN (1,2,3,1234) order by 1;
489  }
490} {1 0 4 2 1 9 3 1 16 199}
491do_test format3-9.3 {
492  count {
493    SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE w IN (-1,1,2,3) order by 1;
494  }
495} {1 0 4 2 1 9 3 1 16 10}
496do_test format3-9.4 {
497  count {
498    SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE w+0 IN (-1,1,2,3) order by 1;
499  }
500} {1 0 4 2 1 9 3 1 16 199}
501do_test format3-9.5 {
502  count {
503    SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE rowid IN
504       (select rowid from t1 where rowid IN (-1,2,4))
505    ORDER BY 1;
506  }
507} {2 1 9 4 2 25 1}
508do_test format3-9.6 {
509  count {
510    SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE rowid+0 IN
511       (select rowid from t1 where rowid IN (-1,2,4))
512    ORDER BY 1;
513  }
514} {2 1 9 4 2 25 199}
515do_test format3-9.7 {
516  count {
517    SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE w IN
518       (select rowid from t1 where rowid IN (-1,2,4))
519    ORDER BY 1;
520  }
521} {2 1 9 4 2 25 7}
522do_test format3-9.8 {
523  count {
524    SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE w+0 IN
525       (select rowid from t1 where rowid IN (-1,2,4))
526    ORDER BY 1;
527  }
528} {2 1 9 4 2 25 199}
529do_test format3-9.9 {
530  count {
531    SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE x IN (1,7) ORDER BY 1;
532  }
533} {2 1 9 3 1 16 6}
534do_test format3-9.10 {
535  count {
536    SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE x+0 IN (1,7) ORDER BY 1;
537  }
538} {2 1 9 3 1 16 199}
539do_test format3-9.11 {
540  count {
541    SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE y IN (6400,8100) ORDER BY 1;
542  }
543} {79 6 6400 89 6 8100 199}
544do_test format3-9.12 {
545  count {
546    SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE x=6 AND y IN (6400,8100) ORDER BY 1;
547  }
548} {79 6 6400 89 6 8100 74}
549do_test format3-9.13 {
550  count {
551    SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE x IN (1,7) AND y NOT IN (6400,8100) ORDER BY 1;
552  }
553} {2 1 9 3 1 16 6}
554do_test format3-9.14 {
555  count {
556    SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE x IN (1,7) AND y IN (9,10) ORDER BY 1;
557  }
558} {2 1 9 6}
559
560# This procedure executes the SQL.  Then it checks the generated program
561# for the SQL and appends a "nosort" to the result if the program contains the
562# SortCallback opcode.  If the program does not contain the SortCallback
563# opcode it appends "sort"
564#
565proc cksort {sql} {
566  set data [execsql $sql]
567  set prog [execsql "EXPLAIN $sql"]
568  if {[regexp SortCallback $prog]} {set x sort} {set x nosort}
569  lappend data $x
570  return $data
571}
572# Check out the logic that attempts to implement the ORDER BY clause
573# using an index rather than by sorting.
574#
575do_test format3-10.1 {
576  execsql {
577    CREATE TABLE t3(a,b,c);
578    CREATE INDEX t3a ON t3(a);
579    CREATE INDEX t3bc ON t3(b,c);
580    CREATE INDEX t3acb ON t3(a,c,b);
581    INSERT INTO t3 SELECT w, 101-w, y FROM t1;
582    SELECT count(*), sum(a), sum(b), sum(c) FROM t3;
583  }
584} {100 5050 5050 348550}
585do_test format3-10.2 {
586  cksort {
587    SELECT * FROM t3 ORDER BY a LIMIT 3
588  }
589} {1 100 4 2 99 9 3 98 16 nosort}
590do_test format3-10.3 {
591  cksort {
592    SELECT * FROM t3 ORDER BY a+1 LIMIT 3
593  }
594} {1 100 4 2 99 9 3 98 16 sort}
595do_test format3-10.4 {
596  cksort {
597    SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE a<10 ORDER BY a LIMIT 3
598  }
599} {1 100 4 2 99 9 3 98 16 nosort}
600do_test format3-10.5 {
601  cksort {
602    SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE a>0 AND a<10 ORDER BY a LIMIT 3
603  }
604} {1 100 4 2 99 9 3 98 16 nosort}
605do_test format3-10.6 {
606  cksort {
607    SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE a>0 ORDER BY a LIMIT 3
608  }
609} {1 100 4 2 99 9 3 98 16 nosort}
610do_test format3-10.7 {
611  cksort {
612    SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE b>0 ORDER BY a LIMIT 3
613  }
614} {1 100 4 2 99 9 3 98 16 sort}
615do_test format3-10.8 {
616  cksort {
617    SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE a IN (3,5,7,1,9,4,2) ORDER BY a LIMIT 3
618  }
619} {1 100 4 2 99 9 3 98 16 sort}
620do_test format3-10.9 {
621  cksort {
622    SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE a=1 AND c>0 ORDER BY a LIMIT 3
623  }
624} {1 100 4 nosort}
625do_test format3-10.10 {
626  cksort {
627    SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE a=1 AND c>0 ORDER BY a LIMIT 3
628  }
629} {1 100 4 nosort}
630do_test format3-10.11 {
631  cksort {
632    SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE a=1 AND c>0 ORDER BY a,c LIMIT 3
633  }
634} {1 100 4 nosort}
635do_test format3-10.12 {
636  cksort {
637    SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE a=1 AND c>0 ORDER BY a,c,b LIMIT 3
638  }
639} {1 100 4 nosort}
640do_test format3-10.13 {
641  cksort {
642    SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE a>0 ORDER BY a DESC LIMIT 3
643  }
644} {100 1 10201 99 2 10000 98 3 9801 nosort}
645do_test format3-10.13.1 {
646  cksort {
647    SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE a>0 ORDER BY a+1 DESC LIMIT 3
648  }
649} {100 1 10201 99 2 10000 98 3 9801 sort}
650do_test format3-10.14 {
651  cksort {
652    SELECT * FROM t3 ORDER BY b LIMIT 3
653  }
654} {100 1 10201 99 2 10000 98 3 9801 nosort}
655do_test format3-10.15 {
656  cksort {
657    SELECT t3.a, t1.x FROM t3, t1 WHERE t3.a=t1.w ORDER BY t3.a LIMIT 3
658  }
659} {1 0 2 1 3 1 nosort}
660do_test format3-10.16 {
661  cksort {
662    SELECT t3.a, t1.x FROM t3, t1 WHERE t3.a=t1.w ORDER BY t1.x, t3.a LIMIT 3
663  }
664} {1 0 2 1 3 1 sort}
665do_test format3-10.17 {
666  cksort {
667    SELECT y FROM t1 ORDER BY w COLLATE text LIMIT 3;
668  }
669} {4 121 10201 sort}
670do_test format3-10.18 {
671  cksort {
672    SELECT y FROM t1 ORDER BY w COLLATE numeric LIMIT 3;
673  }
674} {4 9 16 sort}
675do_test format3-10.19 {
676  cksort {
677    SELECT y FROM t1 ORDER BY w LIMIT 3;
678  }
679} {4 9 16 nosort}
680
681# Check that all comparisons are numeric.  Similar tests in misc1.test
682# check the same comparisons on a format4+ database and find that some
683# are numeric and some are text.
684#
685do_test format3-11.1 {
686  execsql {SELECT '0'=='0.0'}
687} {1}
688do_test format3-11.2 {
689  execsql {SELECT '0'==0.0}
690} {1}
691do_test format3-11.3 {
692  execsql {SELECT '123456789012345678901'=='123456789012345678900'}
693} {1}
694do_test format3-11.4 {
695  execsql {
696    CREATE TABLE t6(a INT UNIQUE, b TEXT UNIQUE);
697    INSERT INTO t6 VALUES('0','0.0');
698    SELECT * FROM t6;
699  }
700} {0 0.0}
701do_test format3-11.5 {
702  execsql {
703    INSERT OR IGNORE INTO t6 VALUES(0.0,'x');
704    SELECT * FROM t6;
705  }
706} {0 0.0}
707do_test format3-11.6 {
708  execsql {
709    INSERT OR IGNORE INTO t6 VALUES('y',0);
710    SELECT * FROM t6;
711  }
712} {0 0.0}
713do_test format3-11.7 {
714  execsql {
715    CREATE TABLE t7(x INTEGER, y TEXT, z);
716    INSERT INTO t7 VALUES(0,0,1);
717    INSERT INTO t7 VALUES(0.0,0,2);
718    INSERT INTO t7 VALUES(0,0.0,3);
719    INSERT INTO t7 VALUES(0.0,0.0,4);
720    SELECT DISTINCT x, y FROM t7 ORDER BY z;
721  }
722} {0 0}
723
724# Make sure attempts to attach a format 3 database fail.
725#
726do_test format3-12.1 {
727  file delete -force test2.db
728  sqlite db2 test2.db
729  catchsql {
730    CREATE TABLE t8(x,y);
731    ATTACH DATABASE 'test.db' AS format3;
732  } db2;
733} {1 {incompatible file format in auxiliary database: format3}}
734do_test format3-12.2 {
735  catchsql {
736    ATTACH DATABASE 'test2.db' AS test2;
737  }
738} {1 {cannot attach auxiliary databases to an older format master database}}
739db2 close
740
741finish_test
742