Searched hist:f6106efae5f4144b32f6c10de0dc3e7efc9181e3 (Results 1 – 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
| /linux/fs/xfs/libxfs/ |
| H A D | xfs_bmap.h | diff f6106efae5f4144b32f6c10de0dc3e7efc9181e3 Mon Jan 11 01:34:01 CET 2016 Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net> xfs: eliminate committed arg from xfs_bmap_finish
Calls to xfs_bmap_finish() and xfs_trans_ijoin(), and the
associated comments were replicated several times across
the attribute code, all dealing with what to do if the
transaction was or wasn't committed.
And in that replicated code, an ASSERT() test of an
uninitialized variable occurs in several locations:
error = xfs_attr_thing(&args);
if (!error) {
error = xfs_bmap_finish(&args.trans, args.flist,
&committed);
}
if (error) {
ASSERT(committed);
If the first xfs_attr_thing() failed, we'd skip the xfs_bmap_finish,
never set "committed", and then test it in the ASSERT.
Fix this up by moving the committed state internal to xfs_bmap_finish,
and add a new inode argument. If an inode is passed in, it is passed
through to __xfs_trans_roll() and joined to the transaction there if
the transaction was committed.
xfs_qm_dqalloc() was a little unique in that it called bjoin rather
than ijoin, but as Dave points out we can detect the committed state
but checking whether (*tpp != tp).
Addresses-Coverity-Id: 102360
Addresses-Coverity-Id: 102361
Addresses-Coverity-Id: 102363
Addresses-Coverity-Id: 102364
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
|
| H A D | xfs_attr.c | diff f6106efae5f4144b32f6c10de0dc3e7efc9181e3 Mon Jan 11 01:34:01 CET 2016 Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net> xfs: eliminate committed arg from xfs_bmap_finish
Calls to xfs_bmap_finish() and xfs_trans_ijoin(), and the
associated comments were replicated several times across
the attribute code, all dealing with what to do if the
transaction was or wasn't committed.
And in that replicated code, an ASSERT() test of an
uninitialized variable occurs in several locations:
error = xfs_attr_thing(&args);
if (!error) {
error = xfs_bmap_finish(&args.trans, args.flist,
&committed);
}
if (error) {
ASSERT(committed);
If the first xfs_attr_thing() failed, we'd skip the xfs_bmap_finish,
never set "committed", and then test it in the ASSERT.
Fix this up by moving the committed state internal to xfs_bmap_finish,
and add a new inode argument. If an inode is passed in, it is passed
through to __xfs_trans_roll() and joined to the transaction there if
the transaction was committed.
xfs_qm_dqalloc() was a little unique in that it called bjoin rather
than ijoin, but as Dave points out we can detect the committed state
but checking whether (*tpp != tp).
Addresses-Coverity-Id: 102360
Addresses-Coverity-Id: 102361
Addresses-Coverity-Id: 102363
Addresses-Coverity-Id: 102364
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
|
| /linux/fs/xfs/ |
| H A D | xfs_rtalloc.c | diff f6106efae5f4144b32f6c10de0dc3e7efc9181e3 Mon Jan 11 01:34:01 CET 2016 Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net> xfs: eliminate committed arg from xfs_bmap_finish
Calls to xfs_bmap_finish() and xfs_trans_ijoin(), and the
associated comments were replicated several times across
the attribute code, all dealing with what to do if the
transaction was or wasn't committed.
And in that replicated code, an ASSERT() test of an
uninitialized variable occurs in several locations:
error = xfs_attr_thing(&args);
if (!error) {
error = xfs_bmap_finish(&args.trans, args.flist,
&committed);
}
if (error) {
ASSERT(committed);
If the first xfs_attr_thing() failed, we'd skip the xfs_bmap_finish,
never set "committed", and then test it in the ASSERT.
Fix this up by moving the committed state internal to xfs_bmap_finish,
and add a new inode argument. If an inode is passed in, it is passed
through to __xfs_trans_roll() and joined to the transaction there if
the transaction was committed.
xfs_qm_dqalloc() was a little unique in that it called bjoin rather
than ijoin, but as Dave points out we can detect the committed state
but checking whether (*tpp != tp).
Addresses-Coverity-Id: 102360
Addresses-Coverity-Id: 102361
Addresses-Coverity-Id: 102363
Addresses-Coverity-Id: 102364
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
|