Searched hist:f4fee216df7d28b87d1c9cc60bcebfecb51c1a05 (Results 1 – 2 of 2) sorted by relevance
/linux/security/apparmor/include/ |
H A D | cred.h | diff f4fee216df7d28b87d1c9cc60bcebfecb51c1a05 Thu Jun 20 19:15:27 CEST 2024 Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com> apparmor: try to avoid refing the label in apparmor_file_open
If the label is not stale (which is the common case), the fact that the passed file object holds a reference can be leverged to avoid the ref/unref cycle. Doing so reduces performance impact of apparmor on parallel open() invocations.
When benchmarking on a 24-core vm using will-it-scale's open1_process ("Separate file open"), the results are (ops/s): before: 6092196 after: 8309726 (+36%)
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
|
/linux/security/apparmor/ |
H A D | lsm.c | diff f4fee216df7d28b87d1c9cc60bcebfecb51c1a05 Thu Jun 20 19:15:27 CEST 2024 Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com> apparmor: try to avoid refing the label in apparmor_file_open
If the label is not stale (which is the common case), the fact that the passed file object holds a reference can be leverged to avoid the ref/unref cycle. Doing so reduces performance impact of apparmor on parallel open() invocations.
When benchmarking on a 24-core vm using will-it-scale's open1_process ("Separate file open"), the results are (ops/s): before: 6092196 after: 8309726 (+36%)
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
|