/linux/drivers/usb/host/ |
H A D | uhci-pci.c | diff de3ef1eb1cd0cc3a75f7a3661e10ed827f370ab8 Sat Jun 24 01:58:53 CEST 2017 Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> PM / core: Drop run_wake flag from struct dev_pm_info
The run_wake flag in struct dev_pm_info is used to indicate whether or not the device is capable of generating remote wakeup signals at run time (or in the system working state), but the distinction between runtime remote wakeup and system wakeup signaling has always been rather artificial. The only practical reason for it to exist at the core level was that ACPI and PCI treated those two cases differently, but that's not the case any more after recent changes.
For this reason, get rid of the run_wake flag and, when applicable, use device_set_wakeup_capable() and device_can_wakeup() instead of device_set_run_wake() and device_run_wake(), respectively.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
|
/linux/drivers/pci/pcie/ |
H A D | pme.c | diff de3ef1eb1cd0cc3a75f7a3661e10ed827f370ab8 Sat Jun 24 01:58:53 CEST 2017 Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> PM / core: Drop run_wake flag from struct dev_pm_info
The run_wake flag in struct dev_pm_info is used to indicate whether or not the device is capable of generating remote wakeup signals at run time (or in the system working state), but the distinction between runtime remote wakeup and system wakeup signaling has always been rather artificial. The only practical reason for it to exist at the core level was that ACPI and PCI treated those two cases differently, but that's not the case any more after recent changes.
For this reason, get rid of the run_wake flag and, when applicable, use device_set_wakeup_capable() and device_can_wakeup() instead of device_set_run_wake() and device_run_wake(), respectively.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
|
/linux/include/linux/ |
H A D | pm_runtime.h | diff de3ef1eb1cd0cc3a75f7a3661e10ed827f370ab8 Sat Jun 24 01:58:53 CEST 2017 Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> PM / core: Drop run_wake flag from struct dev_pm_info
The run_wake flag in struct dev_pm_info is used to indicate whether or not the device is capable of generating remote wakeup signals at run time (or in the system working state), but the distinction between runtime remote wakeup and system wakeup signaling has always been rather artificial. The only practical reason for it to exist at the core level was that ACPI and PCI treated those two cases differently, but that's not the case any more after recent changes.
For this reason, get rid of the run_wake flag and, when applicable, use device_set_wakeup_capable() and device_can_wakeup() instead of device_set_run_wake() and device_run_wake(), respectively.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
|
H A D | pm.h | diff de3ef1eb1cd0cc3a75f7a3661e10ed827f370ab8 Sat Jun 24 01:58:53 CEST 2017 Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> PM / core: Drop run_wake flag from struct dev_pm_info
The run_wake flag in struct dev_pm_info is used to indicate whether or not the device is capable of generating remote wakeup signals at run time (or in the system working state), but the distinction between runtime remote wakeup and system wakeup signaling has always been rather artificial. The only practical reason for it to exist at the core level was that ACPI and PCI treated those two cases differently, but that's not the case any more after recent changes.
For this reason, get rid of the run_wake flag and, when applicable, use device_set_wakeup_capable() and device_can_wakeup() instead of device_set_run_wake() and device_run_wake(), respectively.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
|
/linux/drivers/usb/dwc3/ |
H A D | dwc3-pci.c | diff de3ef1eb1cd0cc3a75f7a3661e10ed827f370ab8 Sat Jun 24 01:58:53 CEST 2017 Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> PM / core: Drop run_wake flag from struct dev_pm_info
The run_wake flag in struct dev_pm_info is used to indicate whether or not the device is capable of generating remote wakeup signals at run time (or in the system working state), but the distinction between runtime remote wakeup and system wakeup signaling has always been rather artificial. The only practical reason for it to exist at the core level was that ACPI and PCI treated those two cases differently, but that's not the case any more after recent changes.
For this reason, get rid of the run_wake flag and, when applicable, use device_set_wakeup_capable() and device_can_wakeup() instead of device_set_run_wake() and device_run_wake(), respectively.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
|
/linux/drivers/acpi/ |
H A D | pci_root.c | diff de3ef1eb1cd0cc3a75f7a3661e10ed827f370ab8 Sat Jun 24 01:58:53 CEST 2017 Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> PM / core: Drop run_wake flag from struct dev_pm_info
The run_wake flag in struct dev_pm_info is used to indicate whether or not the device is capable of generating remote wakeup signals at run time (or in the system working state), but the distinction between runtime remote wakeup and system wakeup signaling has always been rather artificial. The only practical reason for it to exist at the core level was that ACPI and PCI treated those two cases differently, but that's not the case any more after recent changes.
For this reason, get rid of the run_wake flag and, when applicable, use device_set_wakeup_capable() and device_can_wakeup() instead of device_set_run_wake() and device_run_wake(), respectively.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
|
/linux/drivers/pci/ |
H A D | pci-acpi.c | diff de3ef1eb1cd0cc3a75f7a3661e10ed827f370ab8 Sat Jun 24 01:58:53 CEST 2017 Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> PM / core: Drop run_wake flag from struct dev_pm_info
The run_wake flag in struct dev_pm_info is used to indicate whether or not the device is capable of generating remote wakeup signals at run time (or in the system working state), but the distinction between runtime remote wakeup and system wakeup signaling has always been rather artificial. The only practical reason for it to exist at the core level was that ACPI and PCI treated those two cases differently, but that's not the case any more after recent changes.
For this reason, get rid of the run_wake flag and, when applicable, use device_set_wakeup_capable() and device_can_wakeup() instead of device_set_run_wake() and device_run_wake(), respectively.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
|
H A D | pci.c | diff de3ef1eb1cd0cc3a75f7a3661e10ed827f370ab8 Sat Jun 24 01:58:53 CEST 2017 Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> PM / core: Drop run_wake flag from struct dev_pm_info
The run_wake flag in struct dev_pm_info is used to indicate whether or not the device is capable of generating remote wakeup signals at run time (or in the system working state), but the distinction between runtime remote wakeup and system wakeup signaling has always been rather artificial. The only practical reason for it to exist at the core level was that ACPI and PCI treated those two cases differently, but that's not the case any more after recent changes.
For this reason, get rid of the run_wake flag and, when applicable, use device_set_wakeup_capable() and device_can_wakeup() instead of device_set_run_wake() and device_run_wake(), respectively.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
|