Searched hist:dda5f312bb09e56e7a1c3e3851f2000eb2e9c879 (Results 1 – 6 of 6) sorted by relevance
| /linux/arch/arm/lib/ |
| H A D | testsetbit.S | diff dda5f312bb09e56e7a1c3e3851f2000eb2e9c879 Mon Jun 05 09:00:58 CEST 2023 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> locking/atomic: arm: fix sync ops
The sync_*() ops on arch/arm are defined in terms of the regular bitops
with no special handling. This is not correct, as UP kernels elide
barriers for the fully-ordered operations, and so the required ordering
is lost when such UP kernels are run under a hypervsior on an SMP
system.
Fix this by defining sync ops with the required barriers.
Note: On 32-bit arm, the sync_*() ops are currently only used by Xen,
which requires ARMv7, but the semantics can be implemented for ARMv6+.
Fixes: e54d2f61528165bb ("xen/arm: sync_bitops")
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230605070124.3741859-2-mark.rutland@arm.com
|
| H A D | testclearbit.S | diff dda5f312bb09e56e7a1c3e3851f2000eb2e9c879 Mon Jun 05 09:00:58 CEST 2023 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> locking/atomic: arm: fix sync ops
The sync_*() ops on arch/arm are defined in terms of the regular bitops
with no special handling. This is not correct, as UP kernels elide
barriers for the fully-ordered operations, and so the required ordering
is lost when such UP kernels are run under a hypervsior on an SMP
system.
Fix this by defining sync ops with the required barriers.
Note: On 32-bit arm, the sync_*() ops are currently only used by Xen,
which requires ARMv7, but the semantics can be implemented for ARMv6+.
Fixes: e54d2f61528165bb ("xen/arm: sync_bitops")
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230605070124.3741859-2-mark.rutland@arm.com
|
| H A D | testchangebit.S | diff dda5f312bb09e56e7a1c3e3851f2000eb2e9c879 Mon Jun 05 09:00:58 CEST 2023 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> locking/atomic: arm: fix sync ops
The sync_*() ops on arch/arm are defined in terms of the regular bitops
with no special handling. This is not correct, as UP kernels elide
barriers for the fully-ordered operations, and so the required ordering
is lost when such UP kernels are run under a hypervsior on an SMP
system.
Fix this by defining sync ops with the required barriers.
Note: On 32-bit arm, the sync_*() ops are currently only used by Xen,
which requires ARMv7, but the semantics can be implemented for ARMv6+.
Fixes: e54d2f61528165bb ("xen/arm: sync_bitops")
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230605070124.3741859-2-mark.rutland@arm.com
|
| H A D | bitops.h | diff dda5f312bb09e56e7a1c3e3851f2000eb2e9c879 Mon Jun 05 09:00:58 CEST 2023 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> locking/atomic: arm: fix sync ops
The sync_*() ops on arch/arm are defined in terms of the regular bitops
with no special handling. This is not correct, as UP kernels elide
barriers for the fully-ordered operations, and so the required ordering
is lost when such UP kernels are run under a hypervsior on an SMP
system.
Fix this by defining sync ops with the required barriers.
Note: On 32-bit arm, the sync_*() ops are currently only used by Xen,
which requires ARMv7, but the semantics can be implemented for ARMv6+.
Fixes: e54d2f61528165bb ("xen/arm: sync_bitops")
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230605070124.3741859-2-mark.rutland@arm.com
|
| /linux/arch/arm/include/asm/ |
| H A D | sync_bitops.h | diff dda5f312bb09e56e7a1c3e3851f2000eb2e9c879 Mon Jun 05 09:00:58 CEST 2023 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> locking/atomic: arm: fix sync ops
The sync_*() ops on arch/arm are defined in terms of the regular bitops
with no special handling. This is not correct, as UP kernels elide
barriers for the fully-ordered operations, and so the required ordering
is lost when such UP kernels are run under a hypervsior on an SMP
system.
Fix this by defining sync ops with the required barriers.
Note: On 32-bit arm, the sync_*() ops are currently only used by Xen,
which requires ARMv7, but the semantics can be implemented for ARMv6+.
Fixes: e54d2f61528165bb ("xen/arm: sync_bitops")
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230605070124.3741859-2-mark.rutland@arm.com
|
| H A D | assembler.h | diff dda5f312bb09e56e7a1c3e3851f2000eb2e9c879 Mon Jun 05 09:00:58 CEST 2023 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> locking/atomic: arm: fix sync ops
The sync_*() ops on arch/arm are defined in terms of the regular bitops
with no special handling. This is not correct, as UP kernels elide
barriers for the fully-ordered operations, and so the required ordering
is lost when such UP kernels are run under a hypervsior on an SMP
system.
Fix this by defining sync ops with the required barriers.
Note: On 32-bit arm, the sync_*() ops are currently only used by Xen,
which requires ARMv7, but the semantics can be implemented for ARMv6+.
Fixes: e54d2f61528165bb ("xen/arm: sync_bitops")
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230605070124.3741859-2-mark.rutland@arm.com
|