Searched hist:d44f1b8dd7e66d80cc4205809e5ace866bd851da (Results 1 – 5 of 5) sorted by relevance
| /linux/arch/arm64/include/asm/ |
| H A D | kvm_ras.h | diff d44f1b8dd7e66d80cc4205809e5ace866bd851da Tue Jan 29 19:48:50 CET 2019 James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> arm64: KVM/mm: Move SEA handling behind a single 'claim' interface
To split up APEIs in_nmi() path, the caller needs to always be
in_nmi(). Add a helper to do the work and claim the notification.
When KVM or the arch code takes an exception that might be a RAS
notification, it asks the APEI firmware-first code whether it wants
to claim the exception. A future kernel-first mechanism may be queried
afterwards, and claim the notification, otherwise we fall through
to the existing default behaviour.
The NOTIFY_SEA code was merged before considering multiple, possibly
interacting, NMI-like notifications and the need to consider kernel
first in the future. Make the 'claiming' behaviour explicit.
Restructuring the APEI code to allow multiple NMI-like notifications
means any notification that might interrupt interrupts-masked
code must always be wrapped in nmi_enter()/nmi_exit(). This will
allow APEI to use in_nmi() to use the right fixmap entries.
Mask SError over this window to prevent an asynchronous RAS error
arriving and tripping 'nmi_enter()'s BUG_ON(in_nmi()).
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Tested-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| H A D | daifflags.h | diff d44f1b8dd7e66d80cc4205809e5ace866bd851da Tue Jan 29 19:48:50 CET 2019 James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> arm64: KVM/mm: Move SEA handling behind a single 'claim' interface
To split up APEIs in_nmi() path, the caller needs to always be
in_nmi(). Add a helper to do the work and claim the notification.
When KVM or the arch code takes an exception that might be a RAS
notification, it asks the APEI firmware-first code whether it wants
to claim the exception. A future kernel-first mechanism may be queried
afterwards, and claim the notification, otherwise we fall through
to the existing default behaviour.
The NOTIFY_SEA code was merged before considering multiple, possibly
interacting, NMI-like notifications and the need to consider kernel
first in the future. Make the 'claiming' behaviour explicit.
Restructuring the APEI code to allow multiple NMI-like notifications
means any notification that might interrupt interrupts-masked
code must always be wrapped in nmi_enter()/nmi_exit(). This will
allow APEI to use in_nmi() to use the right fixmap entries.
Mask SError over this window to prevent an asynchronous RAS error
arriving and tripping 'nmi_enter()'s BUG_ON(in_nmi()).
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Tested-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| H A D | acpi.h | diff d44f1b8dd7e66d80cc4205809e5ace866bd851da Tue Jan 29 19:48:50 CET 2019 James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> arm64: KVM/mm: Move SEA handling behind a single 'claim' interface
To split up APEIs in_nmi() path, the caller needs to always be
in_nmi(). Add a helper to do the work and claim the notification.
When KVM or the arch code takes an exception that might be a RAS
notification, it asks the APEI firmware-first code whether it wants
to claim the exception. A future kernel-first mechanism may be queried
afterwards, and claim the notification, otherwise we fall through
to the existing default behaviour.
The NOTIFY_SEA code was merged before considering multiple, possibly
interacting, NMI-like notifications and the need to consider kernel
first in the future. Make the 'claiming' behaviour explicit.
Restructuring the APEI code to allow multiple NMI-like notifications
means any notification that might interrupt interrupts-masked
code must always be wrapped in nmi_enter()/nmi_exit(). This will
allow APEI to use in_nmi() to use the right fixmap entries.
Mask SError over this window to prevent an asynchronous RAS error
arriving and tripping 'nmi_enter()'s BUG_ON(in_nmi()).
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Tested-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| /linux/arch/arm64/kernel/ |
| H A D | acpi.c | diff d44f1b8dd7e66d80cc4205809e5ace866bd851da Tue Jan 29 19:48:50 CET 2019 James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> arm64: KVM/mm: Move SEA handling behind a single 'claim' interface
To split up APEIs in_nmi() path, the caller needs to always be
in_nmi(). Add a helper to do the work and claim the notification.
When KVM or the arch code takes an exception that might be a RAS
notification, it asks the APEI firmware-first code whether it wants
to claim the exception. A future kernel-first mechanism may be queried
afterwards, and claim the notification, otherwise we fall through
to the existing default behaviour.
The NOTIFY_SEA code was merged before considering multiple, possibly
interacting, NMI-like notifications and the need to consider kernel
first in the future. Make the 'claiming' behaviour explicit.
Restructuring the APEI code to allow multiple NMI-like notifications
means any notification that might interrupt interrupts-masked
code must always be wrapped in nmi_enter()/nmi_exit(). This will
allow APEI to use in_nmi() to use the right fixmap entries.
Mask SError over this window to prevent an asynchronous RAS error
arriving and tripping 'nmi_enter()'s BUG_ON(in_nmi()).
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Tested-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| /linux/arch/arm64/mm/ |
| H A D | fault.c | diff d44f1b8dd7e66d80cc4205809e5ace866bd851da Tue Jan 29 19:48:50 CET 2019 James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> arm64: KVM/mm: Move SEA handling behind a single 'claim' interface
To split up APEIs in_nmi() path, the caller needs to always be
in_nmi(). Add a helper to do the work and claim the notification.
When KVM or the arch code takes an exception that might be a RAS
notification, it asks the APEI firmware-first code whether it wants
to claim the exception. A future kernel-first mechanism may be queried
afterwards, and claim the notification, otherwise we fall through
to the existing default behaviour.
The NOTIFY_SEA code was merged before considering multiple, possibly
interacting, NMI-like notifications and the need to consider kernel
first in the future. Make the 'claiming' behaviour explicit.
Restructuring the APEI code to allow multiple NMI-like notifications
means any notification that might interrupt interrupts-masked
code must always be wrapped in nmi_enter()/nmi_exit(). This will
allow APEI to use in_nmi() to use the right fixmap entries.
Mask SError over this window to prevent an asynchronous RAS error
arriving and tripping 'nmi_enter()'s BUG_ON(in_nmi()).
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Tested-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|