| /linux/drivers/pinctrl/uniphier/ |
| H A D | pinctrl-uniphier.h | diff c2ebf4754b92f9fb1e422c8c068da7f0b12c9432 Tue May 31 10:05:16 CEST 2016 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> pinctrl: uniphier: introduce capability flag
The core part of the UniPhier pinctrl driver needs to support a new
capability for upcoming UniPhier ARMv8 SoCs. This sometimes happens
because pinctrl drivers include really SoC-specific stuff.
This commit intends to tidy up SoC-specific parameters of the existing
drivers before adding the new one. Having just one flag would be
better than adding a new struct member every time a new SoC-specific
capability comes up.
At this time, there is one flag, UNIPHIER_PINCTRL_CAPS_DBGMUX_SEPARATE.
This capability (I'd say rather quirk) was added for PH1-Pro4 and
PH1-Pro5 as requirement from a customer. For those SoCs, one pin-mux
setting is controlled by the combination of two separate registers; the
LSB bits at register offset (8 * N) and the MSB bits at (8 * N + 4).
Because it is impossible to update two separate registers atomically,
the LOAD_PINCTRL register should be set in order to make the pin-mux
settings really effective.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
| H A D | pinctrl-uniphier-sld8.c | diff c2ebf4754b92f9fb1e422c8c068da7f0b12c9432 Tue May 31 10:05:16 CEST 2016 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> pinctrl: uniphier: introduce capability flag
The core part of the UniPhier pinctrl driver needs to support a new
capability for upcoming UniPhier ARMv8 SoCs. This sometimes happens
because pinctrl drivers include really SoC-specific stuff.
This commit intends to tidy up SoC-specific parameters of the existing
drivers before adding the new one. Having just one flag would be
better than adding a new struct member every time a new SoC-specific
capability comes up.
At this time, there is one flag, UNIPHIER_PINCTRL_CAPS_DBGMUX_SEPARATE.
This capability (I'd say rather quirk) was added for PH1-Pro4 and
PH1-Pro5 as requirement from a customer. For those SoCs, one pin-mux
setting is controlled by the combination of two separate registers; the
LSB bits at register offset (8 * N) and the MSB bits at (8 * N + 4).
Because it is impossible to update two separate registers atomically,
the LOAD_PINCTRL register should be set in order to make the pin-mux
settings really effective.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
| H A D | pinctrl-uniphier-pro5.c | diff c2ebf4754b92f9fb1e422c8c068da7f0b12c9432 Tue May 31 10:05:16 CEST 2016 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> pinctrl: uniphier: introduce capability flag
The core part of the UniPhier pinctrl driver needs to support a new
capability for upcoming UniPhier ARMv8 SoCs. This sometimes happens
because pinctrl drivers include really SoC-specific stuff.
This commit intends to tidy up SoC-specific parameters of the existing
drivers before adding the new one. Having just one flag would be
better than adding a new struct member every time a new SoC-specific
capability comes up.
At this time, there is one flag, UNIPHIER_PINCTRL_CAPS_DBGMUX_SEPARATE.
This capability (I'd say rather quirk) was added for PH1-Pro4 and
PH1-Pro5 as requirement from a customer. For those SoCs, one pin-mux
setting is controlled by the combination of two separate registers; the
LSB bits at register offset (8 * N) and the MSB bits at (8 * N + 4).
Because it is impossible to update two separate registers atomically,
the LOAD_PINCTRL register should be set in order to make the pin-mux
settings really effective.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
| H A D | pinctrl-uniphier-ld6b.c | diff c2ebf4754b92f9fb1e422c8c068da7f0b12c9432 Tue May 31 10:05:16 CEST 2016 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> pinctrl: uniphier: introduce capability flag
The core part of the UniPhier pinctrl driver needs to support a new
capability for upcoming UniPhier ARMv8 SoCs. This sometimes happens
because pinctrl drivers include really SoC-specific stuff.
This commit intends to tidy up SoC-specific parameters of the existing
drivers before adding the new one. Having just one flag would be
better than adding a new struct member every time a new SoC-specific
capability comes up.
At this time, there is one flag, UNIPHIER_PINCTRL_CAPS_DBGMUX_SEPARATE.
This capability (I'd say rather quirk) was added for PH1-Pro4 and
PH1-Pro5 as requirement from a customer. For those SoCs, one pin-mux
setting is controlled by the combination of two separate registers; the
LSB bits at register offset (8 * N) and the MSB bits at (8 * N + 4).
Because it is impossible to update two separate registers atomically,
the LOAD_PINCTRL register should be set in order to make the pin-mux
settings really effective.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
| H A D | pinctrl-uniphier-ld4.c | diff c2ebf4754b92f9fb1e422c8c068da7f0b12c9432 Tue May 31 10:05:16 CEST 2016 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> pinctrl: uniphier: introduce capability flag
The core part of the UniPhier pinctrl driver needs to support a new
capability for upcoming UniPhier ARMv8 SoCs. This sometimes happens
because pinctrl drivers include really SoC-specific stuff.
This commit intends to tidy up SoC-specific parameters of the existing
drivers before adding the new one. Having just one flag would be
better than adding a new struct member every time a new SoC-specific
capability comes up.
At this time, there is one flag, UNIPHIER_PINCTRL_CAPS_DBGMUX_SEPARATE.
This capability (I'd say rather quirk) was added for PH1-Pro4 and
PH1-Pro5 as requirement from a customer. For those SoCs, one pin-mux
setting is controlled by the combination of two separate registers; the
LSB bits at register offset (8 * N) and the MSB bits at (8 * N + 4).
Because it is impossible to update two separate registers atomically,
the LOAD_PINCTRL register should be set in order to make the pin-mux
settings really effective.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
| H A D | pinctrl-uniphier-pxs2.c | diff c2ebf4754b92f9fb1e422c8c068da7f0b12c9432 Tue May 31 10:05:16 CEST 2016 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> pinctrl: uniphier: introduce capability flag
The core part of the UniPhier pinctrl driver needs to support a new
capability for upcoming UniPhier ARMv8 SoCs. This sometimes happens
because pinctrl drivers include really SoC-specific stuff.
This commit intends to tidy up SoC-specific parameters of the existing
drivers before adding the new one. Having just one flag would be
better than adding a new struct member every time a new SoC-specific
capability comes up.
At this time, there is one flag, UNIPHIER_PINCTRL_CAPS_DBGMUX_SEPARATE.
This capability (I'd say rather quirk) was added for PH1-Pro4 and
PH1-Pro5 as requirement from a customer. For those SoCs, one pin-mux
setting is controlled by the combination of two separate registers; the
LSB bits at register offset (8 * N) and the MSB bits at (8 * N + 4).
Because it is impossible to update two separate registers atomically,
the LOAD_PINCTRL register should be set in order to make the pin-mux
settings really effective.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
| H A D | pinctrl-uniphier-pro4.c | diff c2ebf4754b92f9fb1e422c8c068da7f0b12c9432 Tue May 31 10:05:16 CEST 2016 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> pinctrl: uniphier: introduce capability flag
The core part of the UniPhier pinctrl driver needs to support a new
capability for upcoming UniPhier ARMv8 SoCs. This sometimes happens
because pinctrl drivers include really SoC-specific stuff.
This commit intends to tidy up SoC-specific parameters of the existing
drivers before adding the new one. Having just one flag would be
better than adding a new struct member every time a new SoC-specific
capability comes up.
At this time, there is one flag, UNIPHIER_PINCTRL_CAPS_DBGMUX_SEPARATE.
This capability (I'd say rather quirk) was added for PH1-Pro4 and
PH1-Pro5 as requirement from a customer. For those SoCs, one pin-mux
setting is controlled by the combination of two separate registers; the
LSB bits at register offset (8 * N) and the MSB bits at (8 * N + 4).
Because it is impossible to update two separate registers atomically,
the LOAD_PINCTRL register should be set in order to make the pin-mux
settings really effective.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
| H A D | pinctrl-uniphier-core.c | diff c2ebf4754b92f9fb1e422c8c068da7f0b12c9432 Tue May 31 10:05:16 CEST 2016 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> pinctrl: uniphier: introduce capability flag
The core part of the UniPhier pinctrl driver needs to support a new
capability for upcoming UniPhier ARMv8 SoCs. This sometimes happens
because pinctrl drivers include really SoC-specific stuff.
This commit intends to tidy up SoC-specific parameters of the existing
drivers before adding the new one. Having just one flag would be
better than adding a new struct member every time a new SoC-specific
capability comes up.
At this time, there is one flag, UNIPHIER_PINCTRL_CAPS_DBGMUX_SEPARATE.
This capability (I'd say rather quirk) was added for PH1-Pro4 and
PH1-Pro5 as requirement from a customer. For those SoCs, one pin-mux
setting is controlled by the combination of two separate registers; the
LSB bits at register offset (8 * N) and the MSB bits at (8 * N + 4).
Because it is impossible to update two separate registers atomically,
the LOAD_PINCTRL register should be set in order to make the pin-mux
settings really effective.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|