Searched hist:a0a53c8ba95451feef6c1975016f0a1eb3044ad4 (Results 1 – 4 of 4) sorted by relevance
| /linux/include/net/netns/ |
| H A D | unix.h | a0a53c8ba95451feef6c1975016f0a1eb3044ad4 Tue Dec 11 13:19:17 CET 2007 Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org> [NETNS]: struct net content re-work (v3)
Recently David Miller and Herbert Xu pointed out that struct net becomes
overbloated and un-maintainable. There are two solutions:
- provide a pointer to a network subsystem definition from struct net.
This costs an additional dereferrence
- place sub-system definition into the structure itself. This will speedup
run-time access at the cost of recompilation time
The second approach looks better for us. Other sub-systems will follow.
Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| /linux/net/unix/ |
| H A D | sysctl_net_unix.c | diff a0a53c8ba95451feef6c1975016f0a1eb3044ad4 Tue Dec 11 13:19:17 CET 2007 Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org> [NETNS]: struct net content re-work (v3)
Recently David Miller and Herbert Xu pointed out that struct net becomes
overbloated and un-maintainable. There are two solutions:
- provide a pointer to a network subsystem definition from struct net.
This costs an additional dereferrence
- place sub-system definition into the structure itself. This will speedup
run-time access at the cost of recompilation time
The second approach looks better for us. Other sub-systems will follow.
Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| H A D | af_unix.c | diff a0a53c8ba95451feef6c1975016f0a1eb3044ad4 Tue Dec 11 13:19:17 CET 2007 Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org> [NETNS]: struct net content re-work (v3)
Recently David Miller and Herbert Xu pointed out that struct net becomes
overbloated and un-maintainable. There are two solutions:
- provide a pointer to a network subsystem definition from struct net.
This costs an additional dereferrence
- place sub-system definition into the structure itself. This will speedup
run-time access at the cost of recompilation time
The second approach looks better for us. Other sub-systems will follow.
Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| /linux/include/net/ |
| H A D | net_namespace.h | diff a0a53c8ba95451feef6c1975016f0a1eb3044ad4 Tue Dec 11 13:19:17 CET 2007 Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org> [NETNS]: struct net content re-work (v3)
Recently David Miller and Herbert Xu pointed out that struct net becomes
overbloated and un-maintainable. There are two solutions:
- provide a pointer to a network subsystem definition from struct net.
This costs an additional dereferrence
- place sub-system definition into the structure itself. This will speedup
run-time access at the cost of recompilation time
The second approach looks better for us. Other sub-systems will follow.
Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|