/freebsd/sys/sys/ |
H A D | kthread.h | diff 9c8b8baa38c9a8135d7602f127cb0c735010837d Thu Jul 01 15:21:46 CEST 1999 Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> Slight reorganization of kernel thread/process creation. Instead of using SYSINIT_KT() etc (which is a static, compile-time procedure), use a NetBSD-style kthread_create() interface. kproc_start is still available as a SYSINIT() hook. This allowed simplification of chunks of the sysinit code in the process. This kthread_create() is our old kproc_start internals, with the SYSINIT_KT fork hooks grafted in and tweaked to work the same as the NetBSD one.
One thing I'd like to do shortly is get rid of nfsiod as a user initiated process. It makes sense for the nfs client code to create them on the fly as needed up to a user settable limit. This means that nfsiod doesn't need to be in /sbin and is always "available". This is a fair bit easier to do outside of the SYSINIT_KT() framework. 9c8b8baa38c9a8135d7602f127cb0c735010837d Thu Jul 01 15:21:46 CEST 1999 Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> Slight reorganization of kernel thread/process creation. Instead of using SYSINIT_KT() etc (which is a static, compile-time procedure), use a NetBSD-style kthread_create() interface. kproc_start is still available as a SYSINIT() hook. This allowed simplification of chunks of the sysinit code in the process. This kthread_create() is our old kproc_start internals, with the SYSINIT_KT fork hooks grafted in and tweaked to work the same as the NetBSD one.
One thing I'd like to do shortly is get rid of nfsiod as a user initiated process. It makes sense for the nfs client code to create them on the fly as needed up to a user settable limit. This means that nfsiod doesn't need to be in /sbin and is always "available". This is a fair bit easier to do outside of the SYSINIT_KT() framework.
|
H A D | kernel.h | diff 9c8b8baa38c9a8135d7602f127cb0c735010837d Thu Jul 01 15:21:46 CEST 1999 Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> Slight reorganization of kernel thread/process creation. Instead of using SYSINIT_KT() etc (which is a static, compile-time procedure), use a NetBSD-style kthread_create() interface. kproc_start is still available as a SYSINIT() hook. This allowed simplification of chunks of the sysinit code in the process. This kthread_create() is our old kproc_start internals, with the SYSINIT_KT fork hooks grafted in and tweaked to work the same as the NetBSD one.
One thing I'd like to do shortly is get rid of nfsiod as a user initiated process. It makes sense for the nfs client code to create them on the fly as needed up to a user settable limit. This means that nfsiod doesn't need to be in /sbin and is always "available". This is a fair bit easier to do outside of the SYSINIT_KT() framework. diff 9c8b8baa38c9a8135d7602f127cb0c735010837d Thu Jul 01 15:21:46 CEST 1999 Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> Slight reorganization of kernel thread/process creation. Instead of using SYSINIT_KT() etc (which is a static, compile-time procedure), use a NetBSD-style kthread_create() interface. kproc_start is still available as a SYSINIT() hook. This allowed simplification of chunks of the sysinit code in the process. This kthread_create() is our old kproc_start internals, with the SYSINIT_KT fork hooks grafted in and tweaked to work the same as the NetBSD one.
One thing I'd like to do shortly is get rid of nfsiod as a user initiated process. It makes sense for the nfs client code to create them on the fly as needed up to a user settable limit. This means that nfsiod doesn't need to be in /sbin and is always "available". This is a fair bit easier to do outside of the SYSINIT_KT() framework.
|
H A D | proc.h | diff 9c8b8baa38c9a8135d7602f127cb0c735010837d Thu Jul 01 15:21:46 CEST 1999 Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> Slight reorganization of kernel thread/process creation. Instead of using SYSINIT_KT() etc (which is a static, compile-time procedure), use a NetBSD-style kthread_create() interface. kproc_start is still available as a SYSINIT() hook. This allowed simplification of chunks of the sysinit code in the process. This kthread_create() is our old kproc_start internals, with the SYSINIT_KT fork hooks grafted in and tweaked to work the same as the NetBSD one.
One thing I'd like to do shortly is get rid of nfsiod as a user initiated process. It makes sense for the nfs client code to create them on the fly as needed up to a user settable limit. This means that nfsiod doesn't need to be in /sbin and is always "available". This is a fair bit easier to do outside of the SYSINIT_KT() framework. diff 9c8b8baa38c9a8135d7602f127cb0c735010837d Thu Jul 01 15:21:46 CEST 1999 Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> Slight reorganization of kernel thread/process creation. Instead of using SYSINIT_KT() etc (which is a static, compile-time procedure), use a NetBSD-style kthread_create() interface. kproc_start is still available as a SYSINIT() hook. This allowed simplification of chunks of the sysinit code in the process. This kthread_create() is our old kproc_start internals, with the SYSINIT_KT fork hooks grafted in and tweaked to work the same as the NetBSD one.
One thing I'd like to do shortly is get rid of nfsiod as a user initiated process. It makes sense for the nfs client code to create them on the fly as needed up to a user settable limit. This means that nfsiod doesn't need to be in /sbin and is always "available". This is a fair bit easier to do outside of the SYSINIT_KT() framework.
|
/freebsd/sys/kern/ |
H A D | kern_kthread.c | diff 9c8b8baa38c9a8135d7602f127cb0c735010837d Thu Jul 01 15:21:46 CEST 1999 Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> Slight reorganization of kernel thread/process creation. Instead of using SYSINIT_KT() etc (which is a static, compile-time procedure), use a NetBSD-style kthread_create() interface. kproc_start is still available as a SYSINIT() hook. This allowed simplification of chunks of the sysinit code in the process. This kthread_create() is our old kproc_start internals, with the SYSINIT_KT fork hooks grafted in and tweaked to work the same as the NetBSD one.
One thing I'd like to do shortly is get rid of nfsiod as a user initiated process. It makes sense for the nfs client code to create them on the fly as needed up to a user settable limit. This means that nfsiod doesn't need to be in /sbin and is always "available". This is a fair bit easier to do outside of the SYSINIT_KT() framework. 9c8b8baa38c9a8135d7602f127cb0c735010837d Thu Jul 01 15:21:46 CEST 1999 Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> Slight reorganization of kernel thread/process creation. Instead of using SYSINIT_KT() etc (which is a static, compile-time procedure), use a NetBSD-style kthread_create() interface. kproc_start is still available as a SYSINIT() hook. This allowed simplification of chunks of the sysinit code in the process. This kthread_create() is our old kproc_start internals, with the SYSINIT_KT fork hooks grafted in and tweaked to work the same as the NetBSD one.
One thing I'd like to do shortly is get rid of nfsiod as a user initiated process. It makes sense for the nfs client code to create them on the fly as needed up to a user settable limit. This means that nfsiod doesn't need to be in /sbin and is always "available". This is a fair bit easier to do outside of the SYSINIT_KT() framework.
|
H A D | kern_linker.c | diff 9c8b8baa38c9a8135d7602f127cb0c735010837d Thu Jul 01 15:21:46 CEST 1999 Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> Slight reorganization of kernel thread/process creation. Instead of using SYSINIT_KT() etc (which is a static, compile-time procedure), use a NetBSD-style kthread_create() interface. kproc_start is still available as a SYSINIT() hook. This allowed simplification of chunks of the sysinit code in the process. This kthread_create() is our old kproc_start internals, with the SYSINIT_KT fork hooks grafted in and tweaked to work the same as the NetBSD one.
One thing I'd like to do shortly is get rid of nfsiod as a user initiated process. It makes sense for the nfs client code to create them on the fly as needed up to a user settable limit. This means that nfsiod doesn't need to be in /sbin and is always "available". This is a fair bit easier to do outside of the SYSINIT_KT() framework. diff 9c8b8baa38c9a8135d7602f127cb0c735010837d Thu Jul 01 15:21:46 CEST 1999 Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> Slight reorganization of kernel thread/process creation. Instead of using SYSINIT_KT() etc (which is a static, compile-time procedure), use a NetBSD-style kthread_create() interface. kproc_start is still available as a SYSINIT() hook. This allowed simplification of chunks of the sysinit code in the process. This kthread_create() is our old kproc_start internals, with the SYSINIT_KT fork hooks grafted in and tweaked to work the same as the NetBSD one.
One thing I'd like to do shortly is get rid of nfsiod as a user initiated process. It makes sense for the nfs client code to create them on the fly as needed up to a user settable limit. This means that nfsiod doesn't need to be in /sbin and is always "available". This is a fair bit easier to do outside of the SYSINIT_KT() framework.
|
H A D | uipc_mbuf.c | diff 9c8b8baa38c9a8135d7602f127cb0c735010837d Thu Jul 01 15:21:46 CEST 1999 Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> Slight reorganization of kernel thread/process creation. Instead of using SYSINIT_KT() etc (which is a static, compile-time procedure), use a NetBSD-style kthread_create() interface. kproc_start is still available as a SYSINIT() hook. This allowed simplification of chunks of the sysinit code in the process. This kthread_create() is our old kproc_start internals, with the SYSINIT_KT fork hooks grafted in and tweaked to work the same as the NetBSD one.
One thing I'd like to do shortly is get rid of nfsiod as a user initiated process. It makes sense for the nfs client code to create them on the fly as needed up to a user settable limit. This means that nfsiod doesn't need to be in /sbin and is always "available". This is a fair bit easier to do outside of the SYSINIT_KT() framework. diff 9c8b8baa38c9a8135d7602f127cb0c735010837d Thu Jul 01 15:21:46 CEST 1999 Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> Slight reorganization of kernel thread/process creation. Instead of using SYSINIT_KT() etc (which is a static, compile-time procedure), use a NetBSD-style kthread_create() interface. kproc_start is still available as a SYSINIT() hook. This allowed simplification of chunks of the sysinit code in the process. This kthread_create() is our old kproc_start internals, with the SYSINIT_KT fork hooks grafted in and tweaked to work the same as the NetBSD one.
One thing I'd like to do shortly is get rid of nfsiod as a user initiated process. It makes sense for the nfs client code to create them on the fly as needed up to a user settable limit. This means that nfsiod doesn't need to be in /sbin and is always "available". This is a fair bit easier to do outside of the SYSINIT_KT() framework.
|
H A D | vfs_aio.c | diff 9c8b8baa38c9a8135d7602f127cb0c735010837d Thu Jul 01 15:21:46 CEST 1999 Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> Slight reorganization of kernel thread/process creation. Instead of using SYSINIT_KT() etc (which is a static, compile-time procedure), use a NetBSD-style kthread_create() interface. kproc_start is still available as a SYSINIT() hook. This allowed simplification of chunks of the sysinit code in the process. This kthread_create() is our old kproc_start internals, with the SYSINIT_KT fork hooks grafted in and tweaked to work the same as the NetBSD one.
One thing I'd like to do shortly is get rid of nfsiod as a user initiated process. It makes sense for the nfs client code to create them on the fly as needed up to a user settable limit. This means that nfsiod doesn't need to be in /sbin and is always "available". This is a fair bit easier to do outside of the SYSINIT_KT() framework. diff 9c8b8baa38c9a8135d7602f127cb0c735010837d Thu Jul 01 15:21:46 CEST 1999 Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> Slight reorganization of kernel thread/process creation. Instead of using SYSINIT_KT() etc (which is a static, compile-time procedure), use a NetBSD-style kthread_create() interface. kproc_start is still available as a SYSINIT() hook. This allowed simplification of chunks of the sysinit code in the process. This kthread_create() is our old kproc_start internals, with the SYSINIT_KT fork hooks grafted in and tweaked to work the same as the NetBSD one.
One thing I'd like to do shortly is get rid of nfsiod as a user initiated process. It makes sense for the nfs client code to create them on the fly as needed up to a user settable limit. This means that nfsiod doesn't need to be in /sbin and is always "available". This is a fair bit easier to do outside of the SYSINIT_KT() framework.
|
H A D | vfs_export.c | diff 9c8b8baa38c9a8135d7602f127cb0c735010837d Thu Jul 01 15:21:46 CEST 1999 Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> Slight reorganization of kernel thread/process creation. Instead of using SYSINIT_KT() etc (which is a static, compile-time procedure), use a NetBSD-style kthread_create() interface. kproc_start is still available as a SYSINIT() hook. This allowed simplification of chunks of the sysinit code in the process. This kthread_create() is our old kproc_start internals, with the SYSINIT_KT fork hooks grafted in and tweaked to work the same as the NetBSD one.
One thing I'd like to do shortly is get rid of nfsiod as a user initiated process. It makes sense for the nfs client code to create them on the fly as needed up to a user settable limit. This means that nfsiod doesn't need to be in /sbin and is always "available". This is a fair bit easier to do outside of the SYSINIT_KT() framework. diff 9c8b8baa38c9a8135d7602f127cb0c735010837d Thu Jul 01 15:21:46 CEST 1999 Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> Slight reorganization of kernel thread/process creation. Instead of using SYSINIT_KT() etc (which is a static, compile-time procedure), use a NetBSD-style kthread_create() interface. kproc_start is still available as a SYSINIT() hook. This allowed simplification of chunks of the sysinit code in the process. This kthread_create() is our old kproc_start internals, with the SYSINIT_KT fork hooks grafted in and tweaked to work the same as the NetBSD one.
One thing I'd like to do shortly is get rid of nfsiod as a user initiated process. It makes sense for the nfs client code to create them on the fly as needed up to a user settable limit. This means that nfsiod doesn't need to be in /sbin and is always "available". This is a fair bit easier to do outside of the SYSINIT_KT() framework.
|
H A D | init_main.c | diff 9c8b8baa38c9a8135d7602f127cb0c735010837d Thu Jul 01 15:21:46 CEST 1999 Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> Slight reorganization of kernel thread/process creation. Instead of using SYSINIT_KT() etc (which is a static, compile-time procedure), use a NetBSD-style kthread_create() interface. kproc_start is still available as a SYSINIT() hook. This allowed simplification of chunks of the sysinit code in the process. This kthread_create() is our old kproc_start internals, with the SYSINIT_KT fork hooks grafted in and tweaked to work the same as the NetBSD one.
One thing I'd like to do shortly is get rid of nfsiod as a user initiated process. It makes sense for the nfs client code to create them on the fly as needed up to a user settable limit. This means that nfsiod doesn't need to be in /sbin and is always "available". This is a fair bit easier to do outside of the SYSINIT_KT() framework. diff 9c8b8baa38c9a8135d7602f127cb0c735010837d Thu Jul 01 15:21:46 CEST 1999 Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> Slight reorganization of kernel thread/process creation. Instead of using SYSINIT_KT() etc (which is a static, compile-time procedure), use a NetBSD-style kthread_create() interface. kproc_start is still available as a SYSINIT() hook. This allowed simplification of chunks of the sysinit code in the process. This kthread_create() is our old kproc_start internals, with the SYSINIT_KT fork hooks grafted in and tweaked to work the same as the NetBSD one.
One thing I'd like to do shortly is get rid of nfsiod as a user initiated process. It makes sense for the nfs client code to create them on the fly as needed up to a user settable limit. This means that nfsiod doesn't need to be in /sbin and is always "available". This is a fair bit easier to do outside of the SYSINIT_KT() framework.
|
H A D | vfs_subr.c | diff 9c8b8baa38c9a8135d7602f127cb0c735010837d Thu Jul 01 15:21:46 CEST 1999 Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> Slight reorganization of kernel thread/process creation. Instead of using SYSINIT_KT() etc (which is a static, compile-time procedure), use a NetBSD-style kthread_create() interface. kproc_start is still available as a SYSINIT() hook. This allowed simplification of chunks of the sysinit code in the process. This kthread_create() is our old kproc_start internals, with the SYSINIT_KT fork hooks grafted in and tweaked to work the same as the NetBSD one.
One thing I'd like to do shortly is get rid of nfsiod as a user initiated process. It makes sense for the nfs client code to create them on the fly as needed up to a user settable limit. This means that nfsiod doesn't need to be in /sbin and is always "available". This is a fair bit easier to do outside of the SYSINIT_KT() framework. diff 9c8b8baa38c9a8135d7602f127cb0c735010837d Thu Jul 01 15:21:46 CEST 1999 Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> Slight reorganization of kernel thread/process creation. Instead of using SYSINIT_KT() etc (which is a static, compile-time procedure), use a NetBSD-style kthread_create() interface. kproc_start is still available as a SYSINIT() hook. This allowed simplification of chunks of the sysinit code in the process. This kthread_create() is our old kproc_start internals, with the SYSINIT_KT fork hooks grafted in and tweaked to work the same as the NetBSD one.
One thing I'd like to do shortly is get rid of nfsiod as a user initiated process. It makes sense for the nfs client code to create them on the fly as needed up to a user settable limit. This means that nfsiod doesn't need to be in /sbin and is always "available". This is a fair bit easier to do outside of the SYSINIT_KT() framework.
|
/freebsd/sys/powerpc/powerpc/ |
H A D | vm_machdep.c | diff 9c8b8baa38c9a8135d7602f127cb0c735010837d Thu Jul 01 15:21:46 CEST 1999 Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> Slight reorganization of kernel thread/process creation. Instead of using SYSINIT_KT() etc (which is a static, compile-time procedure), use a NetBSD-style kthread_create() interface. kproc_start is still available as a SYSINIT() hook. This allowed simplification of chunks of the sysinit code in the process. This kthread_create() is our old kproc_start internals, with the SYSINIT_KT fork hooks grafted in and tweaked to work the same as the NetBSD one.
One thing I'd like to do shortly is get rid of nfsiod as a user initiated process. It makes sense for the nfs client code to create them on the fly as needed up to a user settable limit. This means that nfsiod doesn't need to be in /sbin and is always "available". This is a fair bit easier to do outside of the SYSINIT_KT() framework. diff 9c8b8baa38c9a8135d7602f127cb0c735010837d Thu Jul 01 15:21:46 CEST 1999 Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> Slight reorganization of kernel thread/process creation. Instead of using SYSINIT_KT() etc (which is a static, compile-time procedure), use a NetBSD-style kthread_create() interface. kproc_start is still available as a SYSINIT() hook. This allowed simplification of chunks of the sysinit code in the process. This kthread_create() is our old kproc_start internals, with the SYSINIT_KT fork hooks grafted in and tweaked to work the same as the NetBSD one.
One thing I'd like to do shortly is get rid of nfsiod as a user initiated process. It makes sense for the nfs client code to create them on the fly as needed up to a user settable limit. This means that nfsiod doesn't need to be in /sbin and is always "available". This is a fair bit easier to do outside of the SYSINIT_KT() framework.
|
/freebsd/sys/amd64/amd64/ |
H A D | vm_machdep.c | diff 9c8b8baa38c9a8135d7602f127cb0c735010837d Thu Jul 01 15:21:46 CEST 1999 Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> Slight reorganization of kernel thread/process creation. Instead of using SYSINIT_KT() etc (which is a static, compile-time procedure), use a NetBSD-style kthread_create() interface. kproc_start is still available as a SYSINIT() hook. This allowed simplification of chunks of the sysinit code in the process. This kthread_create() is our old kproc_start internals, with the SYSINIT_KT fork hooks grafted in and tweaked to work the same as the NetBSD one.
One thing I'd like to do shortly is get rid of nfsiod as a user initiated process. It makes sense for the nfs client code to create them on the fly as needed up to a user settable limit. This means that nfsiod doesn't need to be in /sbin and is always "available". This is a fair bit easier to do outside of the SYSINIT_KT() framework. diff 9c8b8baa38c9a8135d7602f127cb0c735010837d Thu Jul 01 15:21:46 CEST 1999 Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> Slight reorganization of kernel thread/process creation. Instead of using SYSINIT_KT() etc (which is a static, compile-time procedure), use a NetBSD-style kthread_create() interface. kproc_start is still available as a SYSINIT() hook. This allowed simplification of chunks of the sysinit code in the process. This kthread_create() is our old kproc_start internals, with the SYSINIT_KT fork hooks grafted in and tweaked to work the same as the NetBSD one.
One thing I'd like to do shortly is get rid of nfsiod as a user initiated process. It makes sense for the nfs client code to create them on the fly as needed up to a user settable limit. This means that nfsiod doesn't need to be in /sbin and is always "available". This is a fair bit easier to do outside of the SYSINIT_KT() framework.
|
/freebsd/sys/i386/i386/ |
H A D | vm_machdep.c | diff 9c8b8baa38c9a8135d7602f127cb0c735010837d Thu Jul 01 15:21:46 CEST 1999 Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> Slight reorganization of kernel thread/process creation. Instead of using SYSINIT_KT() etc (which is a static, compile-time procedure), use a NetBSD-style kthread_create() interface. kproc_start is still available as a SYSINIT() hook. This allowed simplification of chunks of the sysinit code in the process. This kthread_create() is our old kproc_start internals, with the SYSINIT_KT fork hooks grafted in and tweaked to work the same as the NetBSD one.
One thing I'd like to do shortly is get rid of nfsiod as a user initiated process. It makes sense for the nfs client code to create them on the fly as needed up to a user settable limit. This means that nfsiod doesn't need to be in /sbin and is always "available". This is a fair bit easier to do outside of the SYSINIT_KT() framework. diff 9c8b8baa38c9a8135d7602f127cb0c735010837d Thu Jul 01 15:21:46 CEST 1999 Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> Slight reorganization of kernel thread/process creation. Instead of using SYSINIT_KT() etc (which is a static, compile-time procedure), use a NetBSD-style kthread_create() interface. kproc_start is still available as a SYSINIT() hook. This allowed simplification of chunks of the sysinit code in the process. This kthread_create() is our old kproc_start internals, with the SYSINIT_KT fork hooks grafted in and tweaked to work the same as the NetBSD one.
One thing I'd like to do shortly is get rid of nfsiod as a user initiated process. It makes sense for the nfs client code to create them on the fly as needed up to a user settable limit. This means that nfsiod doesn't need to be in /sbin and is always "available". This is a fair bit easier to do outside of the SYSINIT_KT() framework.
|
/freebsd/sys/vm/ |
H A D | vm_pageout.c | diff 9c8b8baa38c9a8135d7602f127cb0c735010837d Thu Jul 01 15:21:46 CEST 1999 Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> Slight reorganization of kernel thread/process creation. Instead of using SYSINIT_KT() etc (which is a static, compile-time procedure), use a NetBSD-style kthread_create() interface. kproc_start is still available as a SYSINIT() hook. This allowed simplification of chunks of the sysinit code in the process. This kthread_create() is our old kproc_start internals, with the SYSINIT_KT fork hooks grafted in and tweaked to work the same as the NetBSD one.
One thing I'd like to do shortly is get rid of nfsiod as a user initiated process. It makes sense for the nfs client code to create them on the fly as needed up to a user settable limit. This means that nfsiod doesn't need to be in /sbin and is always "available". This is a fair bit easier to do outside of the SYSINIT_KT() framework. diff 9c8b8baa38c9a8135d7602f127cb0c735010837d Thu Jul 01 15:21:46 CEST 1999 Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> Slight reorganization of kernel thread/process creation. Instead of using SYSINIT_KT() etc (which is a static, compile-time procedure), use a NetBSD-style kthread_create() interface. kproc_start is still available as a SYSINIT() hook. This allowed simplification of chunks of the sysinit code in the process. This kthread_create() is our old kproc_start internals, with the SYSINIT_KT fork hooks grafted in and tweaked to work the same as the NetBSD one.
One thing I'd like to do shortly is get rid of nfsiod as a user initiated process. It makes sense for the nfs client code to create them on the fly as needed up to a user settable limit. This means that nfsiod doesn't need to be in /sbin and is always "available". This is a fair bit easier to do outside of the SYSINIT_KT() framework.
|
/freebsd/sys/conf/ |
H A D | files | diff 9c8b8baa38c9a8135d7602f127cb0c735010837d Thu Jul 01 15:21:46 CEST 1999 Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> Slight reorganization of kernel thread/process creation. Instead of using SYSINIT_KT() etc (which is a static, compile-time procedure), use a NetBSD-style kthread_create() interface. kproc_start is still available as a SYSINIT() hook. This allowed simplification of chunks of the sysinit code in the process. This kthread_create() is our old kproc_start internals, with the SYSINIT_KT fork hooks grafted in and tweaked to work the same as the NetBSD one.
One thing I'd like to do shortly is get rid of nfsiod as a user initiated process. It makes sense for the nfs client code to create them on the fly as needed up to a user settable limit. This means that nfsiod doesn't need to be in /sbin and is always "available". This is a fair bit easier to do outside of the SYSINIT_KT() framework. diff 9c8b8baa38c9a8135d7602f127cb0c735010837d Thu Jul 01 15:21:46 CEST 1999 Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> Slight reorganization of kernel thread/process creation. Instead of using SYSINIT_KT() etc (which is a static, compile-time procedure), use a NetBSD-style kthread_create() interface. kproc_start is still available as a SYSINIT() hook. This allowed simplification of chunks of the sysinit code in the process. This kthread_create() is our old kproc_start internals, with the SYSINIT_KT fork hooks grafted in and tweaked to work the same as the NetBSD one.
One thing I'd like to do shortly is get rid of nfsiod as a user initiated process. It makes sense for the nfs client code to create them on the fly as needed up to a user settable limit. This means that nfsiod doesn't need to be in /sbin and is always "available". This is a fair bit easier to do outside of the SYSINIT_KT() framework.
|