| /freebsd/sys/compat/freebsd32/ |
| H A D | freebsd32_systrace_args.c | diff 7893419d492c40ca82b68fca3dcc0f5f7047d39b Mon Dec 04 21:36:08 CET 2023 Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> Remove never implemented sbrk and sstk syscalls
Both system calls were stubs returning EOPNOTSUPP and libc did not
provide _ or __sys_ prefixed symbols. The actual implementation of
sbrk(2) is on top of the undocumented break(2) system call.
Technically this is a change in ABI, but no non-contrived program ever
called these syscalls.
Reviewed by: kib, emaste
Sponsored by: DARPA
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D42872
|
| H A D | freebsd32_syscall.h | diff 7893419d492c40ca82b68fca3dcc0f5f7047d39b Mon Dec 04 21:36:08 CET 2023 Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> Remove never implemented sbrk and sstk syscalls
Both system calls were stubs returning EOPNOTSUPP and libc did not
provide _ or __sys_ prefixed symbols. The actual implementation of
sbrk(2) is on top of the undocumented break(2) system call.
Technically this is a change in ABI, but no non-contrived program ever
called these syscalls.
Reviewed by: kib, emaste
Sponsored by: DARPA
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D42872
|
| H A D | freebsd32_syscalls.c | diff 7893419d492c40ca82b68fca3dcc0f5f7047d39b Mon Dec 04 21:36:08 CET 2023 Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> Remove never implemented sbrk and sstk syscalls
Both system calls were stubs returning EOPNOTSUPP and libc did not
provide _ or __sys_ prefixed symbols. The actual implementation of
sbrk(2) is on top of the undocumented break(2) system call.
Technically this is a change in ABI, but no non-contrived program ever
called these syscalls.
Reviewed by: kib, emaste
Sponsored by: DARPA
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D42872
|
| H A D | freebsd32_sysent.c | diff 7893419d492c40ca82b68fca3dcc0f5f7047d39b Mon Dec 04 21:36:08 CET 2023 Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> Remove never implemented sbrk and sstk syscalls
Both system calls were stubs returning EOPNOTSUPP and libc did not
provide _ or __sys_ prefixed symbols. The actual implementation of
sbrk(2) is on top of the undocumented break(2) system call.
Technically this is a change in ABI, but no non-contrived program ever
called these syscalls.
Reviewed by: kib, emaste
Sponsored by: DARPA
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D42872
|
| /freebsd/sys/kern/ |
| H A D | systrace_args.c | diff 7893419d492c40ca82b68fca3dcc0f5f7047d39b Mon Dec 04 21:36:08 CET 2023 Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> Remove never implemented sbrk and sstk syscalls
Both system calls were stubs returning EOPNOTSUPP and libc did not
provide _ or __sys_ prefixed symbols. The actual implementation of
sbrk(2) is on top of the undocumented break(2) system call.
Technically this is a change in ABI, but no non-contrived program ever
called these syscalls.
Reviewed by: kib, emaste
Sponsored by: DARPA
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D42872
|
| H A D | syscalls.c | diff 7893419d492c40ca82b68fca3dcc0f5f7047d39b Mon Dec 04 21:36:08 CET 2023 Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> Remove never implemented sbrk and sstk syscalls
Both system calls were stubs returning EOPNOTSUPP and libc did not
provide _ or __sys_ prefixed symbols. The actual implementation of
sbrk(2) is on top of the undocumented break(2) system call.
Technically this is a change in ABI, but no non-contrived program ever
called these syscalls.
Reviewed by: kib, emaste
Sponsored by: DARPA
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D42872
|
| H A D | init_sysent.c | diff 7893419d492c40ca82b68fca3dcc0f5f7047d39b Mon Dec 04 21:36:08 CET 2023 Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> Remove never implemented sbrk and sstk syscalls
Both system calls were stubs returning EOPNOTSUPP and libc did not
provide _ or __sys_ prefixed symbols. The actual implementation of
sbrk(2) is on top of the undocumented break(2) system call.
Technically this is a change in ABI, but no non-contrived program ever
called these syscalls.
Reviewed by: kib, emaste
Sponsored by: DARPA
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D42872
|
| H A D | syscalls.master | diff 7893419d492c40ca82b68fca3dcc0f5f7047d39b Mon Dec 04 21:36:08 CET 2023 Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> Remove never implemented sbrk and sstk syscalls
Both system calls were stubs returning EOPNOTSUPP and libc did not
provide _ or __sys_ prefixed symbols. The actual implementation of
sbrk(2) is on top of the undocumented break(2) system call.
Technically this is a change in ABI, but no non-contrived program ever
called these syscalls.
Reviewed by: kib, emaste
Sponsored by: DARPA
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D42872
|
| /freebsd/sys/sys/ |
| H A D | syscall.mk | diff 7893419d492c40ca82b68fca3dcc0f5f7047d39b Mon Dec 04 21:36:08 CET 2023 Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> Remove never implemented sbrk and sstk syscalls
Both system calls were stubs returning EOPNOTSUPP and libc did not
provide _ or __sys_ prefixed symbols. The actual implementation of
sbrk(2) is on top of the undocumented break(2) system call.
Technically this is a change in ABI, but no non-contrived program ever
called these syscalls.
Reviewed by: kib, emaste
Sponsored by: DARPA
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D42872
|
| H A D | syscall.h | diff 7893419d492c40ca82b68fca3dcc0f5f7047d39b Mon Dec 04 21:36:08 CET 2023 Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> Remove never implemented sbrk and sstk syscalls
Both system calls were stubs returning EOPNOTSUPP and libc did not
provide _ or __sys_ prefixed symbols. The actual implementation of
sbrk(2) is on top of the undocumented break(2) system call.
Technically this is a change in ABI, but no non-contrived program ever
called these syscalls.
Reviewed by: kib, emaste
Sponsored by: DARPA
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D42872
|
| H A D | sysproto.h | diff 7893419d492c40ca82b68fca3dcc0f5f7047d39b Mon Dec 04 21:36:08 CET 2023 Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> Remove never implemented sbrk and sstk syscalls
Both system calls were stubs returning EOPNOTSUPP and libc did not
provide _ or __sys_ prefixed symbols. The actual implementation of
sbrk(2) is on top of the undocumented break(2) system call.
Technically this is a change in ABI, but no non-contrived program ever
called these syscalls.
Reviewed by: kib, emaste
Sponsored by: DARPA
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D42872
|
| /freebsd/sys/vm/ |
| H A D | vm_mmap.c | diff 7893419d492c40ca82b68fca3dcc0f5f7047d39b Mon Dec 04 21:36:08 CET 2023 Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> Remove never implemented sbrk and sstk syscalls
Both system calls were stubs returning EOPNOTSUPP and libc did not
provide _ or __sys_ prefixed symbols. The actual implementation of
sbrk(2) is on top of the undocumented break(2) system call.
Technically this is a change in ABI, but no non-contrived program ever
called these syscalls.
Reviewed by: kib, emaste
Sponsored by: DARPA
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D42872
|