Searched hist:"78518 ffa08fceee42d61359303c58bdd0a82033f" (Results 1 – 4 of 4) sorted by relevance
| /linux/drivers/mfd/ |
| H A D | twl-core.h | diff 78518ffa08fceee42d61359303c58bdd0a82033f Wed Feb 29 19:40:31 CET 2012 Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> mfd: Move twl-core IRQ allocation into twl[4030|6030]-irq files
During DT adaptation, the irq_alloc_desc was added into twl-core, but
due to the rather different and weird IRQ management required by the twl4030,
it is much better to have a different approach for it.
The issue is that twl4030 uses a two level IRQ mechanism but handles all the
PWR interrupts as part of the twl-core interrupt range. It ends up with a
range of 16 interrupts total for CORE and PWR.
The other twl4030 functionalities already have a dedicated driver and thus
their IRQs and irqdomain can and should be defined localy.
twl6030 is using a single level IRQ controller and thus does not require any
trick.
Move the irq_alloc_desc and irq_domain_add_legacy in twl4030-irq and
twl6030-irq.
Allocate together CORE and PWR IRQs for twl4030-irq.
Conflicts:
drivers/mfd/twl-core.c
Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
|
| H A D | twl6030-irq.c | diff 78518ffa08fceee42d61359303c58bdd0a82033f Wed Feb 29 19:40:31 CET 2012 Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> mfd: Move twl-core IRQ allocation into twl[4030|6030]-irq files
During DT adaptation, the irq_alloc_desc was added into twl-core, but
due to the rather different and weird IRQ management required by the twl4030,
it is much better to have a different approach for it.
The issue is that twl4030 uses a two level IRQ mechanism but handles all the
PWR interrupts as part of the twl-core interrupt range. It ends up with a
range of 16 interrupts total for CORE and PWR.
The other twl4030 functionalities already have a dedicated driver and thus
their IRQs and irqdomain can and should be defined localy.
twl6030 is using a single level IRQ controller and thus does not require any
trick.
Move the irq_alloc_desc and irq_domain_add_legacy in twl4030-irq and
twl6030-irq.
Allocate together CORE and PWR IRQs for twl4030-irq.
Conflicts:
drivers/mfd/twl-core.c
Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
|
| H A D | twl4030-irq.c | diff 78518ffa08fceee42d61359303c58bdd0a82033f Wed Feb 29 19:40:31 CET 2012 Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> mfd: Move twl-core IRQ allocation into twl[4030|6030]-irq files
During DT adaptation, the irq_alloc_desc was added into twl-core, but
due to the rather different and weird IRQ management required by the twl4030,
it is much better to have a different approach for it.
The issue is that twl4030 uses a two level IRQ mechanism but handles all the
PWR interrupts as part of the twl-core interrupt range. It ends up with a
range of 16 interrupts total for CORE and PWR.
The other twl4030 functionalities already have a dedicated driver and thus
their IRQs and irqdomain can and should be defined localy.
twl6030 is using a single level IRQ controller and thus does not require any
trick.
Move the irq_alloc_desc and irq_domain_add_legacy in twl4030-irq and
twl6030-irq.
Allocate together CORE and PWR IRQs for twl4030-irq.
Conflicts:
drivers/mfd/twl-core.c
Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
|
| H A D | twl-core.c | diff 78518ffa08fceee42d61359303c58bdd0a82033f Wed Feb 29 19:40:31 CET 2012 Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> mfd: Move twl-core IRQ allocation into twl[4030|6030]-irq files
During DT adaptation, the irq_alloc_desc was added into twl-core, but
due to the rather different and weird IRQ management required by the twl4030,
it is much better to have a different approach for it.
The issue is that twl4030 uses a two level IRQ mechanism but handles all the
PWR interrupts as part of the twl-core interrupt range. It ends up with a
range of 16 interrupts total for CORE and PWR.
The other twl4030 functionalities already have a dedicated driver and thus
their IRQs and irqdomain can and should be defined localy.
twl6030 is using a single level IRQ controller and thus does not require any
trick.
Move the irq_alloc_desc and irq_domain_add_legacy in twl4030-irq and
twl6030-irq.
Allocate together CORE and PWR IRQs for twl4030-irq.
Conflicts:
drivers/mfd/twl-core.c
Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
|