| /freebsd/release/scripts/ |
| H A D | mtree-to-plist.awk | diff 697b271da935866850692f7e0cb76434c4e26b13 Wed May 20 21:45:22 CEST 2020 Ed Maste <emaste@FreeBSD.org> pkgbase: use -dev,-dbg instead of -development,-debug
-development is long and awkward, and is also inconsistent with prior art
from the Linux world, which uses -dev (Debian) or -devel (Red Hat). Follow
the Debian convention, and similarly for debug info packages.
Also remove redundant pkgbase development tag from includes. We already tag
include files with package=runtime,dev; there is no need to separately tag
them as dev.
Discussed with: bapt
Reviewed by: manu
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24139
|
| /freebsd/release/packages/ |
| H A D | generate-ucl.sh | diff 697b271da935866850692f7e0cb76434c4e26b13 Wed May 20 21:45:22 CEST 2020 Ed Maste <emaste@FreeBSD.org> pkgbase: use -dev,-dbg instead of -development,-debug
-development is long and awkward, and is also inconsistent with prior art
from the Linux world, which uses -dev (Debian) or -devel (Red Hat). Follow
the Debian convention, and similarly for debug info packages.
Also remove redundant pkgbase development tag from includes. We already tag
include files with package=runtime,dev; there is no need to separately tag
them as dev.
Discussed with: bapt
Reviewed by: manu
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24139
|
| /freebsd/share/mk/ |
| H A D | bsd.incs.mk | diff 697b271da935866850692f7e0cb76434c4e26b13 Wed May 20 21:45:22 CEST 2020 Ed Maste <emaste@FreeBSD.org> pkgbase: use -dev,-dbg instead of -development,-debug
-development is long and awkward, and is also inconsistent with prior art
from the Linux world, which uses -dev (Debian) or -devel (Red Hat). Follow
the Debian convention, and similarly for debug info packages.
Also remove redundant pkgbase development tag from includes. We already tag
include files with package=runtime,dev; there is no need to separately tag
them as dev.
Discussed with: bapt
Reviewed by: manu
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24139
|
| H A D | bsd.prog.mk | diff 697b271da935866850692f7e0cb76434c4e26b13 Wed May 20 21:45:22 CEST 2020 Ed Maste <emaste@FreeBSD.org> pkgbase: use -dev,-dbg instead of -development,-debug
-development is long and awkward, and is also inconsistent with prior art
from the Linux world, which uses -dev (Debian) or -devel (Red Hat). Follow
the Debian convention, and similarly for debug info packages.
Also remove redundant pkgbase development tag from includes. We already tag
include files with package=runtime,dev; there is no need to separately tag
them as dev.
Discussed with: bapt
Reviewed by: manu
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24139
|
| H A D | bsd.lib.mk | diff 697b271da935866850692f7e0cb76434c4e26b13 Wed May 20 21:45:22 CEST 2020 Ed Maste <emaste@FreeBSD.org> pkgbase: use -dev,-dbg instead of -development,-debug
-development is long and awkward, and is also inconsistent with prior art
from the Linux world, which uses -dev (Debian) or -devel (Red Hat). Follow
the Debian convention, and similarly for debug info packages.
Also remove redundant pkgbase development tag from includes. We already tag
include files with package=runtime,dev; there is no need to separately tag
them as dev.
Discussed with: bapt
Reviewed by: manu
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24139
|
| /freebsd/sys/conf/ |
| H A D | kmod.mk | diff 697b271da935866850692f7e0cb76434c4e26b13 Wed May 20 21:45:22 CEST 2020 Ed Maste <emaste@FreeBSD.org> pkgbase: use -dev,-dbg instead of -development,-debug
-development is long and awkward, and is also inconsistent with prior art
from the Linux world, which uses -dev (Debian) or -devel (Red Hat). Follow
the Debian convention, and similarly for debug info packages.
Also remove redundant pkgbase development tag from includes. We already tag
include files with package=runtime,dev; there is no need to separately tag
them as dev.
Discussed with: bapt
Reviewed by: manu
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24139
|
| /freebsd/ |
| H A D | Makefile.inc1 | diff 697b271da935866850692f7e0cb76434c4e26b13 Wed May 20 21:45:22 CEST 2020 Ed Maste <emaste@FreeBSD.org> pkgbase: use -dev,-dbg instead of -development,-debug
-development is long and awkward, and is also inconsistent with prior art
from the Linux world, which uses -dev (Debian) or -devel (Red Hat). Follow
the Debian convention, and similarly for debug info packages.
Also remove redundant pkgbase development tag from includes. We already tag
include files with package=runtime,dev; there is no need to separately tag
them as dev.
Discussed with: bapt
Reviewed by: manu
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24139
|