"4788a5942bc896803c87005be8c6dd14c373a2d3" (history) in projects: linux

Project(s)

Full Search
Definition
Symbol
File Path
History
Type

Searched hist:"4788 a5942bc896803c87005be8c6dd14c373a2d3" (Results 1 – 5 of 5) sorted by relevance

/linux/arch/arc/include/asm/
H A D	irqflags.h	`diff 4788a5942bc896803c87005be8c6dd14c373a2d3 Fri Jan 18 10:42:22 CET 2013 Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> ARC: Support for high priority interrupts in the in-core intc There is a bit of hack/kludge right now where we disable preemption if a L2 (High prio) IRQ is taken while L1 (Low prio) is active. Need to revisit this Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>`
H A D	entry.h	`diff 4788a5942bc896803c87005be8c6dd14c373a2d3 Fri Jan 18 10:42:22 CET 2013 Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> ARC: Support for high priority interrupts in the in-core intc There is a bit of hack/kludge right now where we disable preemption if a L2 (High prio) IRQ is taken while L1 (Low prio) is active. Need to revisit this Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>`
/linux/arch/arc/kernel/
H A D	irq.c	`diff 4788a5942bc896803c87005be8c6dd14c373a2d3 Fri Jan 18 10:42:22 CET 2013 Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> ARC: Support for high priority interrupts in the in-core intc There is a bit of hack/kludge right now where we disable preemption if a L2 (High prio) IRQ is taken while L1 (Low prio) is active. Need to revisit this Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>`
H A D	entry.S	`diff 4788a5942bc896803c87005be8c6dd14c373a2d3 Fri Jan 18 10:42:22 CET 2013 Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> ARC: Support for high priority interrupts in the in-core intc There is a bit of hack/kludge right now where we disable preemption if a L2 (High prio) IRQ is taken while L1 (Low prio) is active. Need to revisit this Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>`
/linux/arch/arc/
H A D	Kconfig	`diff 4788a5942bc896803c87005be8c6dd14c373a2d3 Fri Jan 18 10:42:22 CET 2013 Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> ARC: Support for high priority interrupts in the in-core intc There is a bit of hack/kludge right now where we disable preemption if a L2 (High prio) IRQ is taken while L1 (Low prio) is active. Need to revisit this Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>`