Searched hist:"443 cc4d407dcc04239701b7a418ea5bfd007e0ba" (Results 1 – 2 of 2) sorted by relevance
| /freebsd/sys/dev/xen/blkfront/ |
| H A D | block.h | diff 443cc4d407dcc04239701b7a418ea5bfd007e0ba Thu Feb 16 22:58:47 CET 2012 Justin T. Gibbs <gibbs@FreeBSD.org> Fix a bug in the calculation of the maximum I/O request size.
The previous code did not limit the I/O request size based on
the maximum number of segments supported by the back-end. In
current practice, since the only back-end supporting chained
requests is the FreeBSD implementation, this limit was never
exceeded.
sys/dev/xen/blkfront/block.h:
Add two macros, XBF_SEGS_TO_SIZE() and XBF_SIZE_TO_SEGS(),
to centralize the logic of reserving a segment to deal with
non-page-aligned I/Os.
sys/dev/xen/blkfront/blkfront.c:
o When negotiating transfer parameters, limit the
max_request_size we use and publish, if it is greater
than the maximum, unaligned, I/O we can support with
the number of segments advertised by the backend.
o Don't unilaterally reduce the I/O size published to
the disk layer by a single page. max_request_size
is already properly limited in the transfer parameter
negotiation code.
o Fix typos in printf strings:
"max_requests_segments" -> "max_request_segments"
"specificed" -> "specified"
MFC after: 1 day
|
| H A D | blkfront.c | diff 443cc4d407dcc04239701b7a418ea5bfd007e0ba Thu Feb 16 22:58:47 CET 2012 Justin T. Gibbs <gibbs@FreeBSD.org> Fix a bug in the calculation of the maximum I/O request size.
The previous code did not limit the I/O request size based on
the maximum number of segments supported by the back-end. In
current practice, since the only back-end supporting chained
requests is the FreeBSD implementation, this limit was never
exceeded.
sys/dev/xen/blkfront/block.h:
Add two macros, XBF_SEGS_TO_SIZE() and XBF_SIZE_TO_SEGS(),
to centralize the logic of reserving a segment to deal with
non-page-aligned I/Os.
sys/dev/xen/blkfront/blkfront.c:
o When negotiating transfer parameters, limit the
max_request_size we use and publish, if it is greater
than the maximum, unaligned, I/O we can support with
the number of segments advertised by the backend.
o Don't unilaterally reduce the I/O size published to
the disk layer by a single page. max_request_size
is already properly limited in the transfer parameter
negotiation code.
o Fix typos in printf strings:
"max_requests_segments" -> "max_request_segments"
"specificed" -> "specified"
MFC after: 1 day
|