Searched hist:"14 e43bf435612639cab01541fce7cc41bf7e370b" (Results 1 – 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
| /linux/Documentation/filesystems/ |
| H A D | porting.rst | diff 14e43bf435612639cab01541fce7cc41bf7e370b Tue Sep 22 18:44:18 CEST 2020 Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> vfs: don't unnecessarily clone write access for writable fds
There's no need for mnt_want_write_file() to increment mnt_writers when
the file is already open for writing, provided that
mnt_drop_write_file() is changed to conditionally decrement it.
We seem to have ended up in the current situation because
mnt_want_write_file() used to be paired with mnt_drop_write(), due to
mnt_drop_write_file() not having been added yet. So originally
mnt_want_write_file() had to always increment mnt_writers.
But later mnt_drop_write_file() was added, and all callers of
mnt_want_write_file() were paired with it. This makes the compatibility
between mnt_want_write_file() and mnt_drop_write() no longer necessary.
Therefore, make __mnt_want_write_file() and __mnt_drop_write_file() skip
incrementing mnt_writers on files already open for writing. This
removes the only caller of mnt_clone_write(), so remove that too.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
|
| /linux/include/linux/ |
| H A D | mount.h | diff 14e43bf435612639cab01541fce7cc41bf7e370b Tue Sep 22 18:44:18 CEST 2020 Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> vfs: don't unnecessarily clone write access for writable fds
There's no need for mnt_want_write_file() to increment mnt_writers when
the file is already open for writing, provided that
mnt_drop_write_file() is changed to conditionally decrement it.
We seem to have ended up in the current situation because
mnt_want_write_file() used to be paired with mnt_drop_write(), due to
mnt_drop_write_file() not having been added yet. So originally
mnt_want_write_file() had to always increment mnt_writers.
But later mnt_drop_write_file() was added, and all callers of
mnt_want_write_file() were paired with it. This makes the compatibility
between mnt_want_write_file() and mnt_drop_write() no longer necessary.
Therefore, make __mnt_want_write_file() and __mnt_drop_write_file() skip
incrementing mnt_writers on files already open for writing. This
removes the only caller of mnt_clone_write(), so remove that too.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
|
| /linux/fs/ |
| H A D | namespace.c | diff 14e43bf435612639cab01541fce7cc41bf7e370b Tue Sep 22 18:44:18 CEST 2020 Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> vfs: don't unnecessarily clone write access for writable fds
There's no need for mnt_want_write_file() to increment mnt_writers when
the file is already open for writing, provided that
mnt_drop_write_file() is changed to conditionally decrement it.
We seem to have ended up in the current situation because
mnt_want_write_file() used to be paired with mnt_drop_write(), due to
mnt_drop_write_file() not having been added yet. So originally
mnt_want_write_file() had to always increment mnt_writers.
But later mnt_drop_write_file() was added, and all callers of
mnt_want_write_file() were paired with it. This makes the compatibility
between mnt_want_write_file() and mnt_drop_write() no longer necessary.
Therefore, make __mnt_want_write_file() and __mnt_drop_write_file() skip
incrementing mnt_writers on files already open for writing. This
removes the only caller of mnt_clone_write(), so remove that too.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
|