Searched hist:"0 d7ae06860753bb30b3731302b994da071120d00" (Results 1 – 2 of 2) sorted by relevance
| /linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ |
| H A D | timer.c | diff 0d7ae06860753bb30b3731302b994da071120d00 Wed Oct 04 18:23:39 CEST 2023 David Vernet <void@manifault.com> selftests/bpf: Test pinning bpf timer to a core
Now that we support pinning a BPF timer to the current core, we should
test it with some selftests. This patch adds two new testcases to the
timer suite, which verifies that a BPF timer both with and without
BPF_F_TIMER_ABS, can be pinned to the calling core with BPF_F_TIMER_CPU_PIN.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231004162339.200702-3-void@manifault.com
|
| /linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/ |
| H A D | timer.c | diff 0d7ae06860753bb30b3731302b994da071120d00 Wed Oct 04 18:23:39 CEST 2023 David Vernet <void@manifault.com> selftests/bpf: Test pinning bpf timer to a core
Now that we support pinning a BPF timer to the current core, we should
test it with some selftests. This patch adds two new testcases to the
timer suite, which verifies that a BPF timer both with and without
BPF_F_TIMER_ABS, can be pinned to the calling core with BPF_F_TIMER_CPU_PIN.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231004162339.200702-3-void@manifault.com
|