Lines Matching refs:hardcode_direct
1115 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
2176 if test no != "$_LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)" &&
4963 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
5171 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
5329 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5362 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=unsupported
5432 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5441 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
5458 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=unsupported
5649 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5656 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5665 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5677 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5694 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5742 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
5746 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5813 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5819 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5830 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5957 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5966 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes # is this really true???
5973 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
5977 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no #Motorola manual says yes, but my tests say they lie
6158 _LT_TAGDECL([], [hardcode_direct], [0],
6310 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
6499 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
6508 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
6525 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=unsupported
6783 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
6831 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
6835 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
6894 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
7105 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
7118 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
7672 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
7808 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no