115     // Compensate for the relocation offset, Darwin x86_64 relocations only have  in RecordX86_64Relocation()
118     // following the relocation are not accommodated for (see comment below  in RecordX86_64Relocation()
128     // it. I think it would require a local relocation, but I'm not sure if that  in RecordX86_64Relocation()
129     // would work either. The official way to get an absolute PCrel relocation  in RecordX86_64Relocation()
149                                    "unsupported relocation of modified symbol");  in RecordX86_64Relocation()
157           Fixup.getLoc(), "unsupported pc-relative relocation of difference");  in RecordX86_64Relocation()
162     // require a local relocation is handled just like if the symbols were  in RecordX86_64Relocation()
166     // relocation entries.  in RecordX86_64Relocation()
169     // single SIGNED relocation); reject it for now.  Except the case where both  in RecordX86_64Relocation()
173           Fixup.getLoc(), "unsupported relocation with identical base");  in RecordX86_64Relocation()
182         "unsupported relocation with subtraction expression, symbol '" +  in RecordX86_64Relocation()
218     // understand x86_64 relocation entries, and expects to find values that  in RecordX86_64Relocation()
251                                      "unsupported relocation of variable '" +  in RecordX86_64Relocation()
257           Fixup.getLoc(), "unsupported relocation of undefined symbol '" +  in RecordX86_64Relocation()
277               Fixup.getLoc(), "unsupported symbol modifier in relocation");  in RecordX86_64Relocation()
282           // The Darwin x86_64 relocation format has a problem where it cannot  in RecordX86_64Relocation()
286           // relocation entry (e.g., movb $012, L0(%rip)). Even with the PCrel  in RecordX86_64Relocation()
290           // To work around this, Darwin uses several special relocation types  in RecordX86_64Relocation()
306               "unsupported symbol modifier in branch relocation");  in RecordX86_64Relocation()
317         // case all we do is set the PCrel bit in the relocation entry; this is  in RecordX86_64Relocation()
328             Fixup.getLoc(), "unsupported symbol modifier in relocation");  in RecordX86_64Relocation()
392     // Select the appropriate difference relocation type.  in recordScatteredRelocation()
395     // relocation types from the linkers point of view, this is done solely for  in recordScatteredRelocation()
406     // If the offset is too large to fit in a scattered relocation,  in recordScatteredRelocation()
415                          "relocation entry.");  in recordScatteredRelocation()
429     // relocation offset field, so we fall back to using a non-scattered  in recordScatteredRelocation()
430     // relocation. This is a bit risky, as if the offset reaches out of  in recordScatteredRelocation()
460          "Should only be called with a 32-bit TLVP relocation!");  in recordTLVPRelocation()
508   // scattered relocation entry. Differences always require scattered  in RecordX86Relocation()
521   // If this is an internal relocation with an offset, it also needs a scattered  in RecordX86Relocation()
522   // relocation entry.  in RecordX86Relocation()
527   // Try to record the scattered relocation if needed. Fall back to non  in RecordX86Relocation()
560     // Check whether we need an external or internal relocation.  in RecordX86Relocation()