Lines Matching refs:hardcode_direct
1108 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
2169 if test no != "$_LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)" &&
4975 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
5186 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
5344 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5377 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=unsupported
5447 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5456 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
5473 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=unsupported
5664 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5671 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5680 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5692 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5709 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5757 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
5761 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5829 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5835 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5846 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5973 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5982 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes # is this really true???
5989 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
5993 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no #Motorola manual says yes, but my tests say they lie
6174 _LT_TAGDECL([], [hardcode_direct], [0],
6330 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
6519 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
6528 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
6545 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=unsupported
6803 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
6851 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
6855 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
6914 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
7125 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
7138 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
7692 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
7828 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no