Lines Matching refs:constructor

106     if all these implementations have a public default constructor (such that
285 ## Should I use the constructor/destructor of the test fixture or SetUp()/TearDown()? {#CtorVsSetUp}
293 between using the test fixture constructor/destructor or `SetUp()`/`TearDown()`.
296 *   By initializing a member variable in the constructor, we have the option to
300     constructor is guaranteed to call the base class' constructor *first*, and
310     dispatch. It will use the definition from the class the constructor of which
312     derived class constructor has a chance to run is very dangerous - the
316 *   In the body of a constructor (or destructor), it's not possible to use the
320     executable, or to use `SetUp()` instead of a constructor.
370 ## My compiler complains that a constructor (or destructor) cannot return a value. What's going on?
381 content of your constructor/destructor to a private void member function, or
503 must have a default constructor. Normally the compiler will define one for you.
506 *   If you explicitly declare a non-default constructor for class `FooTest`
508     default constructor, even if it would be empty.
510     default constructor *and* initialize the const member in the initializer
511     list of the constructor. (Early versions of `gcc` doesn't force you to