Lines Matching refs:hardcode_direct
1106 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
2181 if test no != "$_LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)" &&
4974 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
5183 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
5341 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5374 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=unsupported
5444 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5453 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
5470 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=unsupported
5661 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5668 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5677 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5689 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5706 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5754 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
5758 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5825 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5831 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5842 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5970 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5979 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes # is this really true???
5986 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
5990 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no #Motorola manual says yes, but my tests say they lie
6171 _LT_TAGDECL([], [hardcode_direct], [0],
6327 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
6516 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
6525 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
6542 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=unsupported
6801 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
6849 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
6853 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
6912 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
7123 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
7136 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
7690 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
7826 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no