History log of /freebsd/sys/net80211/ieee80211_ht.c (Results 26 – 50 of 244)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: release/11.4.0
# a67acf11 12-Jun-2020 Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.org>

[net80211] First part of A-MSDU offload handling - don't bump A-MPDU reordering seqno

When doing A-MSDU offload handling the driver is required to mark
A-MSDUs from the same MPDU with the same seque

[net80211] First part of A-MSDU offload handling - don't bump A-MPDU reordering seqno

When doing A-MSDU offload handling the driver is required to mark
A-MSDUs from the same MPDU with the same sequence number.
It then tags them as AMSDU (if it's a decap'ed A-MSDU) and AMSDU_MORE
(saying there's more AMSDUs decapped in the same MSDU.)
This allows encryption and sequence number offload to work right.

In the A-MSDU path the sequence number check looks at the A-MSDU flags
in the frame to see whether it's part of the same seqno and will pass them
(ie, not increment rx_seq until the last A-MSDU is seen from the driver,
or a new seqno shows up.0

However, I did this work in the A-MSDU path but not the A-MSDU in A-MPDU path.
For the non A-MDSU offload case the A-MPDU receive reordering will do its
thing and then pass up the MPDU up for decap - which then will see it's
an A-MSDU and decap each sub-frame. But this isn't done for offloaded
A-MSDU frames.

This requires two parts:

* Don't bump the RX sequence number, same as above; and
* If frames go into the reordering buffer, they need to be added into the slot
as a set of frames rather than a single frame, so once a new seqno shows up
this slot can be marked as "full" and we can move on.

This patch does the first. The latter requires that I find and commit
work to change rxa_m from an mbuf to an mbufq and the nhandle A-MSDU
there. But, the first is enough to allow the normal case (ie, no or not
a lot of A-MPDU RX reordering) to work.

This allows the athp driver (QCA9880) throughput to go from VERY low
(like 5mbit TCP, 1/3-1/4 expected UDP throughput) to ~ 250mbit TCP
and > 300mbit UDP on a VHT/40 channel. TCP sucks because, well, it
shows up as MASSIVE packet loss when all but one frame in a decap'ed
A-MSDU stream is dropped. Le whoops.

Now, where'd I put that laptop with the patch for rxa_m mbufq that
I wrote like in 2017...

Tested:

* AR9380, STA/AP mode (a big no-op, no A-MSDU hardware decap);
* if_run (RT3593), STA DWDS mode (A-MPDU / A-MSDU receive, but again
no A-MSDU hardware decap);
* QCA9880, STA/AP mode (which is doing hardware A-MPDU/A-MSDU decap,
but no A-MPDU reordering in the firmware.)

show more ...


# ebb9b256 05-Jun-2020 Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.org>

[net80211] Add initial A-MSDU in A-MPDU negotation support.

This is hopefully a big no-op unless you're running some extra
patches to flip on A-MSDU options in a driver.

802.11n supports sending A-

[net80211] Add initial A-MSDU in A-MPDU negotation support.

This is hopefully a big no-op unless you're running some extra
patches to flip on A-MSDU options in a driver.

802.11n supports sending A-MSDU in A-MPDU. That lets you do things
like pack small frames into an A-MSDU and stuff /those/ into an A-MPDU.
It allows for much more efficient airtime because you're not
wasting time sending small frames - which is still a problem when
doing A-MPDU as there's still per-frame overhead and minimum A-MPDU
density requirements.

It, however, is optional for 802.11n. A lot of stuff doesn't advertise
it (but does it, just wait!); and I know that ath10k does it and my
ath(4) driver work supports it.

Now, 802.11ac makes A-MSDU in A-MPDU something that can happen more
frequently, because even though you can send very large A-MPDUs
(like 1 megabyte and larger) you still have the small frame problem.
So, 802.11ac NICs like ath10k and iwm will support A-MSDU in A-MPDU
out of the box if it's enabled - and you can negotiate it.

So, let's lay down the ground work to enable A-MSDU in A-MPDU.
This will allow hardware like iwn(4) and ath(4) which supports
software A-MSDU but hardware A-MPDU to be more efficient.

Drivers that support A-MSDU in A-MPDU will set TX/RX htcap flags.
Note this is separate from the software A-MSDU encap path; /that/
dictates whether net80211 is doing A-MSDU encapsulation or not.
These HTC flags control negotiation, NOT encapsulation.

Once this negotiation and driver bits are done, hardware like
rtwn(4), run(4), and others will be able to use A-MSDU even without
A-MPDU working; right now FF and A-MSDU aren't even attempted
if you're an 11n node. It's a small hold-over from the initial
A-MPDU work and I know how to fix it, but to flip it on properly
I need to be able to negotiate or ignore A-MSDU in A-MPDU.

Oh and the fun part - some 11ac APs I've tested will quite happily
decap A-MSDU in A-MPDU even though they don't negotiate it when
doing 802.11n. So hey, I know it works - I just want to properly
handle things. :-)

Tested:

* AR9380, STA/AP mode

show more ...


# 7280f374 05-Jun-2020 Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.org>

[net80211] Add some TODOs around A-MSDU in A-MPDU negotiation.

net80211 currently doesn't negotiate A-MSDU in A-MPDU during ADDBA.
I've added the field in net80211 and this commit:

* Prints out the

[net80211] Add some TODOs around A-MSDU in A-MPDU negotiation.

net80211 currently doesn't negotiate A-MSDU in A-MPDU during ADDBA.
I've added the field in net80211 and this commit:

* Prints out the ADDBA field value during ADDBA;
* Adds some comments around where I need to follow up with some
negotiation logic.

Right now we don't have a driver flag anywhere which controls
whether A-MSDU in A-MPDU is allowed. I know it works (I have it
manually turned on at home on a couple test APs, heh!) but
I can't flip it on until we can negotiate it.

Tested:

* AR9380, STA/AP mode, printing out ADDBA requests

show more ...


# 24a22d1d 22-Feb-2020 Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>

Merge r358179 through r358238.

PR: 244251


# 08f5e6bb 21-Feb-2020 Pawel Biernacki <kaktus@FreeBSD.org>

Mark more nodes as CTLFLAG_MPSAFE or CTLFLAG_NEEDGIANT (7 of many)

r357614 added CTLFLAG_NEEDGIANT to make it easier to find nodes that are
still not MPSAFE (or already are but aren’t properly marke

Mark more nodes as CTLFLAG_MPSAFE or CTLFLAG_NEEDGIANT (7 of many)

r357614 added CTLFLAG_NEEDGIANT to make it easier to find nodes that are
still not MPSAFE (or already are but aren’t properly marked).
Use it in preparation for a general review of all nodes.

This is non-functional change that adds annotations to SYSCTL_NODE and
SYSCTL_PROC nodes using one of the soon-to-be-required flags.

Mark all low hanging fruits as MPSAFE.

Reviewed by: markj
Approved by: kib (mentor, blanket)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D23626

show more ...


Revision tags: release/12.1.0, release/11.3.0
# 2aaf9152 18-Mar-2019 Alan Somers <asomers@FreeBSD.org>

MFHead@r345275


# f35b8451 18-Mar-2019 Andriy Voskoboinyk <avos@FreeBSD.org>

net80211: correct check for SMPS node flags updates

Update node flags when driver supports SMPS, not when it is disabled or
in dynamic mode ((iv_htcaps & HTCAP_SMPS) != 0).

Checked with RTL8188EE (

net80211: correct check for SMPS node flags updates

Update node flags when driver supports SMPS, not when it is disabled or
in dynamic mode ((iv_htcaps & HTCAP_SMPS) != 0).

Checked with RTL8188EE (1T1R), STA mode - 'smps' word should disappear
from 'ifconfig wlan0' output.

MFC after: 2 weeks

show more ...


# c981cbbd 15-Feb-2019 Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>

Merge ^/head r343956 through r344177.


# f3f08e16 11-Feb-2019 Andriy Voskoboinyk <avos@FreeBSD.org>

net80211(4): hide casts for 'i_seq' field offset calculation inside
ieee80211_getqos() and reuse it in various places.

Checked with RTL8188EE, HOSTAP mode + RTL8188CUS, STA mode.

MFC after: 2 weeks


Revision tags: release/12.0.0, release/11.2.0
# 4fc74049 29-Dec-2017 Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>

Merge ^/head r327169 through r327340.


# caa7e52f 27-Dec-2017 Eitan Adler <eadler@FreeBSD.org>

kernel: Fix several typos and minor errors

- duplicate words
- typos
- references to old versions of FreeBSD

Reviewed by: imp, benno


# fe267a55 27-Nov-2017 Pedro F. Giffuni <pfg@FreeBSD.org>

sys: general adoption of SPDX licensing ID tags.

Mainly focus on files that use BSD 2-Clause license, however the tool I
was using misidentified many licenses so this was mostly a manual - error
pro

sys: general adoption of SPDX licensing ID tags.

Mainly focus on files that use BSD 2-Clause license, however the tool I
was using misidentified many licenses so this was mostly a manual - error
prone - task.

The Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX) group provides a specification
to make it easier for automated tools to detect and summarize well known
opensource licenses. We are gradually adopting the specification, noting
that the tags are considered only advisory and do not, in any way,
superceed or replace the license texts.

No functional change intended.

show more ...


Revision tags: release/10.4.0, release/11.1.0
# 27c24068 22-May-2017 Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>

Merge ^/head r318560 through r318657.


# 85c4e670 20-May-2017 Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.org>

[net80211] prepare for A-MSDU/A-MPDU offload crypto / sequence number checking.

When doing AMSDU offload, the driver (for now!) presents 802.11 frames with
the same sequence number and crypto sequen

[net80211] prepare for A-MSDU/A-MPDU offload crypto / sequence number checking.

When doing AMSDU offload, the driver (for now!) presents 802.11 frames with
the same sequence number and crypto sequence number / IV values up to the stack.
But, this will trip afoul over the sequence number detection.

So drivers now have a way to signify that a frame is part of an offloaded
AMSDU group, so we can just ensure that we pass those frames up to the
stack.

The logic will be a bit messy - the TL;DR will be that if it's part of
the previously seen sequence number then it belongs in the same burst.
But if we get a repeat of the same sequence number (eg we sent an ACK
but the receiver didn't hear it) then we shouldn't be passing those frames
up. So, we can't just say "all subframes go up", we need to track
whether we've seen the end of a burst of frames for the given sequence
number or not, so we know whether to actually pass them up or not.

The first part of doing all of this is to ensure the ieee80211_rx_stats
struct is available in the RX sequence number check path and the
RX ampdu reorder path. So, start by passing the pointer into these
functions to avoid doing another lookup.

The actual support will come in a subsequent commit once I know the
functionality actually works!

show more ...


# 82bd08ee 11-Apr-2017 Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.org>

[net80211] refactor out "add slot" and "purge slot" for A-MPDU.

This is in preparation for A-MSDU decap in A-MPDU support.

* refactor out the code to purge a single reorder slot into ampdu_rx_purge

[net80211] refactor out "add slot" and "purge slot" for A-MPDU.

This is in preparation for A-MSDU decap in A-MPDU support.

* refactor out the code to purge a single reorder slot into ampdu_rx_purge_slot().
* refactor out the code to add a frame to the given reorder slot
to ampdu_rx_add_slot().

This should be a big no-op as far as current code is concerned.

Tested:

* QCA9880v2, STA mode (11ac)
* iwn(4), STA mode (11n)

Reviewed by: avos
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10328

show more ...


# 2d6ab41d 06-Apr-2017 Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.org>

[net80211] refactor out the A-MPDU dispatch routine.

The "dispatch a frame from the A-MPDU reorder buffer" code is essentially
duplicated in a couple of places. This refactors it out into a single

[net80211] refactor out the A-MPDU dispatch routine.

The "dispatch a frame from the A-MPDU reorder buffer" code is essentially
duplicated in a couple of places. This refactors it out into a single
place in preparation for A-MSDU in A-MPDU offload support, where multiple
A-MSDUs are decap'ed in hardware to 802.3/802.11 frames, but with the
same sequence number.

Reviewed by: avos
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10240

show more ...


# b06dfd58 02-Apr-2017 Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.org>

[net80211] refactor the A-MPDU RX window code

The RX window update code is effectively the same in both locations.

Reviewed by: avos
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10208


# dfabbaa0 03-Mar-2017 Andriy Voskoboinyk <avos@FreeBSD.org>

net80211: fix ieee80211_htrateset setup, return EINVAL for an unsupported
ucast/mcast/mgmt HT rate.

- Init global ieee80211_htrateset only once; neither ic_htcaps nor
ic_txstream is changed when dev

net80211: fix ieee80211_htrateset setup, return EINVAL for an unsupported
ucast/mcast/mgmt HT rate.

- Init global ieee80211_htrateset only once; neither ic_htcaps nor
ic_txstream is changed when device is attached;
- Move global ieee80211_htrateset structure to ieee80211com;
there was a possible data race when more than 1 wireless device is
used simultaneously;
- Discard unsupported rates in ieee80211_ioctl_settxparams(); otherwise,
an unsupported value may break connectivity (actually,
'ifconfig wlan0 ucastrate 8' for RTL8188EU results in immediate
disconnect + infinite 'device timeout's after it).

Tested with:
- Intel 6205, STA mode.
- RTL8821AU, STA mode.

Reviewed by: adrian
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9871

show more ...


# 9b3ece1c 04-Feb-2017 Enji Cooper <ngie@FreeBSD.org>

MFhead@r313243


# 71fe94fd 01-Feb-2017 Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>

Merge ^/head r312968 through r313054.


# 9764ef21 30-Jan-2017 Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.org>

[net80211] address seqno allocation for group addressed frames

After some digging and looking at packet traces, it looks like the
sequence number allocation being done by net80211 doesn't meet
802.1

[net80211] address seqno allocation for group addressed frames

After some digging and looking at packet traces, it looks like the
sequence number allocation being done by net80211 doesn't meet
802.11-2012.

Specifically, group addressed frames (broadcast, multicast) have
sequence numbers allocated from a separate pool, even if they're
QoS frames.

This patch starts to try and address this, both on transmit and
receive.

* When receiving, don't throw away multicast frames for now.
It's sub-optimal, but until we correctly track group addressed
frames via another TID counter, this is the best we can do.

* When doing A-MPDU checks, don't include group addressed frames
in the sequence number checks.

* When transmitting, don't allocate group frame sequence numbers
from the TID, instead use the NONQOS TID for allocation.

This may fix iwn(4) 11n because I /think/ this was one of the
handful of places where ni_txseqs[] was being assigned /outside/
of the driver itself.

This however doesn't completely fix things - notably the way that
TID assignment versus WME assignment for driver hardware queues
will mess up multicast ordering. For example, if all multicast
QoS frames come from one sequence number space but they're
expected to obey the QoS value assigned, they'll end up in
different queues in the hardware and go out in different
orders.

I can't fix that right now and indeed fixing it will require some
pretty heavy lifting of both the WME<->TID QoS assignment, as well
as figuring out what the correct way for drivers to behave.

For example, both iwn(4) and ath(4) shouldn't put QoS multicast
traffic into the same output queue as aggregate traffic, because
the sequence numbers are all wrong. So perhaps the correct thing
to do there is ignore the WME/TID for QoS traffic and map it all
to the best effort queue or something, and ensure it doesn't
muck up the TID/blockack window tracking. However, I'm /pretty/
sure that is still going to happen.

.. maybe I should disable multicast QoS frames in general as well,
but I don't know what that'll do for whatever the current state
of 802.11s mesh support is.

Tested:

* STA mode, ath10k NIC
* AP mode, AR9344/AR9580 AP
* iperf tcp/udp tests with concurrent multicast QoS traffic.

Before this, iperfs would fail pretty quickly because the sending
AP would start sending out QoS multicast frames that would be
out of order from the rest of the TID traffic, causing the blockack
window to get way, way out of sync.

This now doesn't occur.

TODO:

* verify which QoS frames SHOULD be tagged as M_AMPDU_MPDU.
For example, QoS NULL frames shouldn't be tagged!

Reviewed by: avos
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9357

show more ...


# a4aa656a 22-Jan-2017 Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>

Merge ^/head r312309 through r312623.


# c5bba9da 21-Jan-2017 Andriy Voskoboinyk <avos@FreeBSD.org>

net80211: allow to configure LDPC support

Tested with RTL8821AU, STA mode (Tx support only)

Reviewed by: adrian
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9268


# d370fd1c 14-Jan-2017 Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>

Merge ^/head r311940 through r312200.


# 51172f62 13-Jan-2017 Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.org>

[net80211] Initial VHT node upgrade/downgrade support and initial IE parsing.

This is the bulk of the magic to start enabling VHT channel negotiation.
It is absolutely, positively not yet even a com

[net80211] Initial VHT node upgrade/downgrade support and initial IE parsing.

This is the bulk of the magic to start enabling VHT channel negotiation.
It is absolutely, positively not yet even a complete VHT wave-1 implementation.

* parse IEs in scan, assoc req/resp, probe req/resp;
* break apart the channel upgrade from the HT IE parsing - do it after the
VHT IEs are parsed;
* (dirty! sigh) add channel width decision making in ieee80211_ht.c htinfo_update_chw().
This is the main bit where negotiated channel promotion through IEs occur.
* Shoehorn in VHT node init ,teardown, rate control, etc calls like the HT
versions;
* Do VHT channel adjustment where appropriate

Tested:

* monitor mode, ath10k port
* STA mode, ath10k port - VHT20, VHT40, VHT80 modes

TODO:

* IBSS;
* hostap;
* (ignore mesh, wds for now);
* finish 11n state engine - channel width change, opmode notifications, SMPS, etc;
* VHT basic rate negotiation and acceptance criteria when scanning, associating, etc;
* VHT control/management frame handling (group managment and operating mode being
the two big ones);
* Verify TX/RX VHT rate negotiation is actually working correctly.

Whilst here, add some comments about seqno allocation and locking. To achieve
the full VHT rates I need to push seqno allocation into the drivers and
finally remove the IEEE80211_TX_LOCK() I added years ago to fix issues. :/

show more ...


12345678910