libllvm: promote WithColor and xxhash to SRCS_MIN

The armv6 build failed in CI due to missing symbols (from these two
source files) in the bootstrap Clang.

This affected only armv6 because other Cl

libllvm: promote WithColor and xxhash to SRCS_MIN

The armv6 build failed in CI due to missing symbols (from these two
source files) in the bootstrap Clang.

This affected only armv6 because other Clang-using archs are using LLD
as the bootstrap linker, and thus include SRCS_MIW via LLD_BOOTSTRAP.

Reported by: CI, via lwhsu
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation

show more ...

MFhead@r344786

Upgrade our copies of clang, llvm, lld, lldb, compiler-rt and libc++ to
the upstream release_80 branch r355313 (effectively, 8.0.0 rc3). The
release will follow very soon, but no more functional cha

Upgrade our copies of clang, llvm, lld, lldb, compiler-rt and libc++ to
the upstream release_80 branch r355313 (effectively, 8.0.0 rc3). The
release will follow very soon, but no more functional changes are
expected.

Release notes for llvm, clang and lld 8.0.0 will soon be available here:
<https://releases.llvm.org/8.0.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html>
<https://releases.llvm.org/8.0.0/tools/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.html>
<https://releases.llvm.org/8.0.0/tools/lld/docs/ReleaseNotes.html>

PR: 236062
Relnotes: yes
MFC after: 1 month

show more ...

Update llvm and clang build glue to make MK_CLANG_EXTRAS=yes and
MK_CLANG_FULL=yes work.

Add and remove sources from libllvm and libclang, to make the minimal
clang executable (with all options except targets off) build.

Upgrade our copies of clang, llvm, lld, lldb, compiler-rt and libc++ to
the upstream release_70 branch r348686 (effectively, 7.0.1 rc3). The
release will follow very soon, but no more functional cha

Upgrade our copies of clang, llvm, lld, lldb, compiler-rt and libc++ to
the upstream release_70 branch r348686 (effectively, 7.0.1 rc3). The
release will follow very soon, but no more functional changes are
expected.

Release notes for llvm, clang and lld 7.0.0 are available here:
<http://releases.llvm.org/7.0.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html>
<http://releases.llvm.org/7.0.0/tools/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.html>
<http://releases.llvm.org/7.0.0/tools/lld/docs/ReleaseNotes.html>

PR: 230240, 230355
Relnotes: yes
MFC after: 2 months

show more ...

Merge ^/head r340235 through r340367.

libllvm: Move SampleProfWriter to SRCS_MIN

It is required by llvm-profdata, now built by default under the
LLVM_COV knob. The additional complexity that would come from avoiding
building it if CLAN

libllvm: Move SampleProfWriter to SRCS_MIN

It is required by llvm-profdata, now built by default under the
LLVM_COV knob. The additional complexity that would come from avoiding
building it if CLANG_EXTRAS and LLVM_COV are both disabled is not worth
the small savings in build time.

Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation

show more ...

MFH @ r337607, in preparation for boarding

Merge ^/head r337286 through r337585.

Add optional LLVM BPF target support

BPF (eBPF) is an independent instruction set architecture which is
introduced in Linux a few years ago. Originally, eBPF execute
environment was only inside Linu

Add optional LLVM BPF target support

BPF (eBPF) is an independent instruction set architecture which is
introduced in Linux a few years ago. Originally, eBPF execute
environment was only inside Linux kernel. However, recent years there
are some user space implementation (https://github.com/iovisor/ubpf,
https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/prog_guide/bpf_lib.html) and kernel space
implementation for FreeBSD is going on
(https://github.com/YutaroHayakawa/generic-ebpf).

The BPF target support can be enabled using WITH_LLVM_TARGET_BPF, as it
is not built by default.

Submitted by: Yutaro Hayakawa <yhayakawa3720@gmail.com>
Reviewed by: dim, bdrewery
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D16033

show more ...

The JSON support needs one more file in libllvm, again for llvm-tblgen.

Add one more file to libllvm, needed for llvm-tblgen.

Update build glue for upstream r338536 import.

Update build blue to make WITH_CLANG_EXTRAS and WITH_CLANG_FULL work.

Make the minimal clang executable build.

Remove SRCS for files that have been deleted upstream.

Revert r335449 and add needed MK_LLD_BOOTSTRAP check for SRCS_MIW.

This effectively reverts r335449 and changes the previous MK_LLD_IS_LD
to a MK_LLD_BOOTSTRAP check. If !TOOLS_PREFIX then these so

Revert r335449 and add needed MK_LLD_BOOTSTRAP check for SRCS_MIW.

This effectively reverts r335449 and changes the previous MK_LLD_IS_LD
to a MK_LLD_BOOTSTRAP check. If !TOOLS_PREFIX then these sources are
always built for llvm-objdump, lld, and llvm-cov. When TOOLS_PREFIX
is set then they are only needed if lld is being bootstrapped.

Reported by: dim
Pointyhat to: bdrewery
Sponsored by: Dell EMC

show more ...

Add support for selectively enabling LLVM targets

This makes it possible, through src.conf(5) settings, to select which
LLVM targets you want to build during buildworld. The current list is:

* (WI

Add support for selectively enabling LLVM targets

This makes it possible, through src.conf(5) settings, to select which
LLVM targets you want to build during buildworld. The current list is:

* (WITH|WITHOUT)_LLVM_TARGET_AARCH64
* (WITH|WITHOUT)_LLVM_TARGET_ARM
* (WITH|WITHOUT)_LLVM_TARGET_MIPS
* (WITH|WITHOUT)_LLVM_TARGET_POWERPC
* (WITH|WITHOUT)_LLVM_TARGET_SPARC
* (WITH|WITHOUT)_LLVM_TARGET_X86

To not influence anything right now, all of these are on by default, in
situations where clang is enabled.

Selectively turning a few targets off manually should work. Turning on
only one target should work too, even if that target does not correspond
to the build architecture. (In that case, LLVM_NATIVE_ARCH will not be
defined, and you can only use the resulting clang executable for
cross-compiling.)

I performed a few measurements on one of the FreeBSD.org reference
machines, building clang from scratch, with all targets enabled, and
with only the x86 target enabled. The latter was ~12% faster in real
time (on a 32-core box), and ~14% faster in user time. For a full
buildworld the difference will probably be less pronounced, though.

Reviewed by: bdrewery
MFC after: 1 week
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D11077

show more ...

Fix sources needed for lld.

lld always needs these DWARF sources, as well as other default and extra
tools. XDL seems to be the best fit list.

Remove MK_LLD_IS_LD check from SRCS_MIW which is now r

Fix sources needed for lld.

lld always needs these DWARF sources, as well as other default and extra
tools. XDL seems to be the best fit list.

Remove MK_LLD_IS_LD check from SRCS_MIW which is now reduced to just a
few files for llvm-objdump.

Sponsored by: Dell EMC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D15915

show more ...

Rework WITHOUT_LLD/TOOLCHAIN fix from r327892 for cross-tools.

MK_LLD is for the installed lld while MK_LLD_BOOTSTRAP is for the build
tool. For WITH_SYSTEM_LINKER it is necesarry to separate the l

Rework WITHOUT_LLD/TOOLCHAIN fix from r327892 for cross-tools.

MK_LLD is for the installed lld while MK_LLD_BOOTSTRAP is for the build
tool. For WITH_SYSTEM_LINKER it is necesarry to separate the logic of
these two. When building libllvm TOOLS_PREFIX will be defined and
MK_LLD_BOOTSTRAP should be checked instead.

Sponsored by: Dell EMC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D15837

show more ...

Recommit r332501, with an additional upstream fix for "Cannot lower
EFLAGS copy that lives out of a basic block!" errors on i386.

Pull in r325446 from upstream clang trunk (by me):

[X86] Add 'sah

Recommit r332501, with an additional upstream fix for "Cannot lower
EFLAGS copy that lives out of a basic block!" errors on i386.

Pull in r325446 from upstream clang trunk (by me):

[X86] Add 'sahf' CPU feature to frontend

Summary:
Make clang accept `-msahf` (and `-mno-sahf`) flags to activate the
`+sahf` feature for the backend, for bug 36028 (Incorrect use of
pushf/popf enables/disables interrupts on amd64 kernels). This was
originally submitted in bug 36037 by Jonathan Looney
<jonlooney@gmail.com>.

As described there, GCC also uses `-msahf` for this feature, and the
backend already recognizes the `+sahf` feature. All that is needed is
to teach clang to pass this on to the backend.

The mapping of feature support onto CPUs may not be complete; rather,
it was chosen to match LLVM's idea of which CPUs support this feature
(see lib/Target/X86/X86.td).

I also updated the affected test case (CodeGen/attr-target-x86.c) to
match the emitted output.

Reviewers: craig.topper, coby, efriedma, rsmith

Reviewed By: craig.topper

Subscribers: emaste, cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43394

Pull in r328944 from upstream llvm trunk (by Chandler Carruth):

[x86] Expose more of the condition conversion routines in the public
API for X86's instruction information. I've now got a second patch
under review that needs these same APIs. This bit is nicely
orthogonal and obvious, so landing it. NFC.

Pull in r329414 from upstream llvm trunk (by Craig Topper):

[X86] Merge itineraries for CLC, CMC, and STC.

These are very simple flag setting instructions that appear to only
be a single uop. They're unlikely to need this separation.

Pull in r329657 from upstream llvm trunk (by Chandler Carruth):

[x86] Introduce a pass to begin more systematically fixing PR36028
and similar issues.

The key idea is to lower COPY nodes populating EFLAGS by scanning the
uses of EFLAGS and introducing dedicated code to preserve the
necessary state in a GPR. In the vast majority of cases, these uses
are cmovCC and jCC instructions. For such cases, we can very easily
save and restore the necessary information by simply inserting a
setCC into a GPR where the original flags are live, and then testing
that GPR directly to feed the cmov or conditional branch.

However, things are a bit more tricky if arithmetic is using the
flags. This patch handles the vast majority of cases that seem to
come up in practice: adc, adcx, adox, rcl, and rcr; all without
taking advantage of partially preserved EFLAGS as LLVM doesn't
currently model that at all.

There are a large number of operations that techinaclly observe
EFLAGS currently but shouldn't in this case -- they typically are
using DF. Currently, they will not be handled by this approach.
However, I have never seen this issue come up in practice. It is
already pretty rare to have these patterns come up in practical code
with LLVM. I had to resort to writing MIR tests to cover most of the
logic in this pass already. I suspect even with its current amount
of coverage of arithmetic users of EFLAGS it will be a significant
improvement over the current use of pushf/popf. It will also produce
substantially faster code in most of the common patterns.

This patch also removes all of the old lowering for EFLAGS copies,
and the hack that forced us to use a frame pointer when EFLAGS copies
were found anywhere in a function so that the dynamic stack
adjustment wasn't a problem. None of this is needed as we now lower
all of these copies directly in MI and without require stack
adjustments.

Lots of thanks to Reid who came up with several aspects of this
approach, and Craig who helped me work out a couple of things
tripping me up while working on this.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45146

Pull in r329673 from upstream llvm trunk (by Chandler Carruth):

[x86] Model the direction flag (DF) separately from the rest of
EFLAGS.

This cleans up a number of operations that only claimed te use EFLAGS
due to using DF. But no instructions which we think of us setting
EFLAGS actually modify DF (other than things like popf) and so this
needlessly creates uses of EFLAGS that aren't really there.

In fact, DF is so restrictive it is pretty easy to model. Only STD,
CLD, and the whole-flags writes (WRFLAGS and POPF) need to model
this.

I've also somewhat cleaned up some of the flag management instruction
definitions to be in the correct .td file.

Adding this extra register also uncovered a failure to use the
correct datatype to hold X86 registers, and I've corrected that as
necessary here.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45154

Pull in r330264 from upstream llvm trunk (by Chandler Carruth):

[x86] Fix PR37100 by teaching the EFLAGS copy lowering to rewrite
uses across basic blocks in the limited cases where it is very
straight forward to do so.

This will also be useful for other places where we do some limited
EFLAGS propagation across CFG edges and need to handle copy rewrites
afterward. I think this is rapidly approaching the maximum we can and
should be doing here. Everything else begins to require either heroic
analysis to prove how to do PHI insertion manually, or somehow
managing arbitrary PHI-ing of EFLAGS with general PHI insertion.
Neither of these seem at all promising so if those cases come up,
we'll almost certainly need to rewrite the parts of LLVM that produce
those patterns.

We do now require dominator trees in order to reliably diagnose
patterns that would require PHI nodes. This is a bit unfortunate but
it seems better than the completely mysterious crash we would get
otherwise.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45673

Together, these should ensure clang does not use pushf/popf sequences to
save and restore flags, avoiding problems with unrelated flags (such as
the interrupt flag) being restored unexpectedly.

Requested by: jtl
PR: 225330
MFC after: 1 week

show more ...

Revert r332501 for now, as it can cause build failures on i386.
Reported upstream as <https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37133>.

Reported by: emaste, ci.freebsd.org
PR: 225330

Pull in r325446 from upstream clang trunk (by me):

[X86] Add 'sahf' CPU feature to frontend

Summary:
Make clang accept `-msahf` (and `-mno-sahf`) flags to activate the
`+sahf` feature for t

Pull in r325446 from upstream clang trunk (by me):

[X86] Add 'sahf' CPU feature to frontend

Summary:
Make clang accept `-msahf` (and `-mno-sahf`) flags to activate the
`+sahf` feature for the backend, for bug 36028 (Incorrect use of
pushf/popf enables/disables interrupts on amd64 kernels). This was
originally submitted in bug 36037 by Jonathan Looney
<jonlooney@gmail.com>.

As described there, GCC also uses `-msahf` for this feature, and the
backend already recognizes the `+sahf` feature. All that is needed is
to teach clang to pass this on to the backend.

The mapping of feature support onto CPUs may not be complete; rather,
it was chosen to match LLVM's idea of which CPUs support this feature
(see lib/Target/X86/X86.td).

I also updated the affected test case (CodeGen/attr-target-x86.c) to
match the emitted output.

Reviewers: craig.topper, coby, efriedma, rsmith

Reviewed By: craig.topper

Subscribers: emaste, cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43394

Pull in r328944 from upstream llvm trunk (by Chandler Carruth):

[x86] Expose more of the condition conversion routines in the public
API for X86's instruction information. I've now got a second patch
under review that needs these same APIs. This bit is nicely
orthogonal and obvious, so landing it. NFC.

Pull in r329414 from upstream llvm trunk (by Craig Topper):

[X86] Merge itineraries for CLC, CMC, and STC.

These are very simple flag setting instructions that appear to only
be a single uop. They're unlikely to need this separation.

Pull in r329657 from upstream llvm trunk (by Chandler Carruth):

[x86] Introduce a pass to begin more systematically fixing PR36028
and similar issues.

The key idea is to lower COPY nodes populating EFLAGS by scanning the
uses of EFLAGS and introducing dedicated code to preserve the
necessary state in a GPR. In the vast majority of cases, these uses
are cmovCC and jCC instructions. For such cases, we can very easily
save and restore the necessary information by simply inserting a
setCC into a GPR where the original flags are live, and then testing
that GPR directly to feed the cmov or conditional branch.

However, things are a bit more tricky if arithmetic is using the
flags. This patch handles the vast majority of cases that seem to
come up in practice: adc, adcx, adox, rcl, and rcr; all without
taking advantage of partially preserved EFLAGS as LLVM doesn't
currently model that at all.

There are a large number of operations that techinaclly observe
EFLAGS currently but shouldn't in this case -- they typically are
using DF. Currently, they will not be handled by this approach.
However, I have never seen this issue come up in practice. It is
already pretty rare to have these patterns come up in practical code
with LLVM. I had to resort to writing MIR tests to cover most of the
logic in this pass already. I suspect even with its current amount
of coverage of arithmetic users of EFLAGS it will be a significant
improvement over the current use of pushf/popf. It will also produce
substantially faster code in most of the common patterns.

This patch also removes all of the old lowering for EFLAGS copies,
and the hack that forced us to use a frame pointer when EFLAGS copies
were found anywhere in a function so that the dynamic stack
adjustment wasn't a problem. None of this is needed as we now lower
all of these copies directly in MI and without require stack
adjustments.

Lots of thanks to Reid who came up with several aspects of this
approach, and Craig who helped me work out a couple of things
tripping me up while working on this.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45146

Pull in r329673 from upstream llvm trunk (by Chandler Carruth):

[x86] Model the direction flag (DF) separately from the rest of
EFLAGS.

This cleans up a number of operations that only claimed te use EFLAGS
due to using DF. But no instructions which we think of us setting
EFLAGS actually modify DF (other than things like popf) and so this
needlessly creates uses of EFLAGS that aren't really there.

In fact, DF is so restrictive it is pretty easy to model. Only STD,
CLD, and the whole-flags writes (WRFLAGS and POPF) need to model
this.

I've also somewhat cleaned up some of the flag management instruction
definitions to be in the correct .td file.

Adding this extra register also uncovered a failure to use the
correct datatype to hold X86 registers, and I've corrected that as
necessary here.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45154

Together, these should ensure clang does not use pushf/popf sequences to
save and restore flags, avoiding problems with unrelated flags (such as
the interrupt flag) being restored unexpectedly.

Requested by: jtl
PR: 225330
MFC after: 1 week

show more ...

Promote llvm-cov to a standalone option

Introduce WITH_/WITHOUT_LLVM_COV to match GCC's WITH_/WITHOUT_GCOV.
It is intended to provide a superset of the interface and functionality
of gcov.

It is en

Promote llvm-cov to a standalone option

Introduce WITH_/WITHOUT_LLVM_COV to match GCC's WITH_/WITHOUT_GCOV.
It is intended to provide a superset of the interface and functionality
of gcov.

It is enabled by default when building Clang, similarly to gcov and GCC.

This change moves one file in libllvm to be compiled unconditionally.
Previously it was included only when WITH_CLANG_EXTRAS was set, but the
complexity of a new special case for (CLANG_EXTRAS | LLVM_COV) is not
worth avoiding a tiny increase in build time.

Reviewed by: dim, imp
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D142645

show more ...