Revision tags: release/8.4.0 |
|
#
336e0c87 |
| 11-May-2013 |
Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@FreeBSD.org> |
sh: Remove linked list of stack marks.
The linked list of stack marks may cause problems if the allocation stack is used between an exception and a higher-level popstackmark(), as it may then touch
sh: Remove linked list of stack marks.
The linked list of stack marks may cause problems if the allocation stack is used between an exception and a higher-level popstackmark(), as it may then touch a stack mark that is local to a function which has returned.
Also, the adjustment compares to a pointer passed to realloc(), which is undefined behaviour.
Instead of adjusting stack marks when reallocating stack blocks, ensure that such an adjustment is never necessary by fixing a small piece of memory in place at a stack mark. This also simplifies the code.
To avoid the problems reported in bin/175922, it remains necessary to call setstackmark() after popstackmark() if the stack mark remains in use.
show more ...
|
#
69e6d7b7 |
| 12-Apr-2013 |
Simon J. Gerraty <sjg@FreeBSD.org> |
sync from head
|
#
46c6b52d |
| 01-Apr-2013 |
Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@FreeBSD.org> |
sh: Fix various compiler warnings.
It now passes WARNS=7 with clang on i386.
GCC 4.2.1 does not understand setjmp() properly so will always trigger -Wuninitialized. I will not add the volatile keyw
sh: Fix various compiler warnings.
It now passes WARNS=7 with clang on i386.
GCC 4.2.1 does not understand setjmp() properly so will always trigger -Wuninitialized. I will not add the volatile keywords to suppress this.
show more ...
|
Revision tags: release/9.1.0, release/8.3.0_cvs, release/8.3.0, release/9.0.0, release/7.4.0_cvs, release/8.2.0_cvs, release/7.4.0, release/8.2.0 |
|
#
33a84133 |
| 09-Jan-2011 |
Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@FreeBSD.org> |
sh: Follow-up to r216743, grabstackblock() can be replaced with stalloc().
grabstackblock() was used only once (but it is a very often executed piece of code).
|
#
ff802dc7 |
| 27-Dec-2010 |
Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@FreeBSD.org> |
sh: Simplify "stack string" code slightly.
Maintain a pointer to the end of the stack string area instead of how much space is left. This simplifies the macros in memalloc.h. The places where the ne
sh: Simplify "stack string" code slightly.
Maintain a pointer to the end of the stack string area instead of how much space is left. This simplifies the macros in memalloc.h. The places where the new variable must be updated are only where the memory area is created, destroyed or resized.
show more ...
|
#
78962f36 |
| 26-Dec-2010 |
Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@FreeBSD.org> |
sh: Fix integer overflow check, it checked an uninitialized variable.
|
#
d8f32e72 |
| 26-Dec-2010 |
Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@FreeBSD.org> |
sh: Allow arbitrary large numbers in CHECKSTRSPACE. Reduce "stack string" API somewhat and simplify code. Add a check for integer overflow of the "stack string" length (probably incomplete).
|
#
9f5a68a0 |
| 12-Dec-2010 |
Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@FreeBSD.org> |
sh: Remove the herefd hack.
The herefd hack wrote out partial here documents while expanding them. It seems unnecessary complication given that other expansions just allocate memory. It causes bugs
sh: Remove the herefd hack.
The herefd hack wrote out partial here documents while expanding them. It seems unnecessary complication given that other expansions just allocate memory. It causes bugs because the stack is also used for intermediate results such as arithmetic expressions. Such places should disable herefd for the duration but not all of them do, and I prefer removing the need for disabling herefd to disabling it everywhere needed.
Here documents larger than 1024 bytes will use a bit more CPU time and memory.
Additionally this allows a later change to expand here documents in the current shell environment. (This is faster for small here documents but also changes behaviour.)
Obtained from: dash
show more ...
|
#
1e7a698a |
| 25-Nov-2010 |
Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> |
Sync: merge r215709 through r215824 from ^/head.
|
#
9d37e157 |
| 23-Nov-2010 |
Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@FreeBSD.org> |
sh: Code size optimizations to "stack string" memory allocation: * Prefer one CHECKSTRSPACE with multiple USTPUTC to multiple STPUTC. * Add STPUTS macro (based on function) and use it instead of loop
sh: Code size optimizations to "stack string" memory allocation: * Prefer one CHECKSTRSPACE with multiple USTPUTC to multiple STPUTC. * Add STPUTS macro (based on function) and use it instead of loops that add nul-terminated strings to the stack string.
No functional change is intended, but code size is about 1K less on i386.
show more ...
|
#
7cfe6941 |
| 14-Oct-2010 |
David E. O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org> |
Do not assume in growstackstr() that a "precious" character will be immediately written into the stack after the call. Instead let the caller manage the "space left".
Previously, growstackstr()'s a
Do not assume in growstackstr() that a "precious" character will be immediately written into the stack after the call. Instead let the caller manage the "space left".
Previously, growstackstr()'s assumption causes problems with STACKSTRNUL() where we want to be able to turn a stack into a C string, and later pretend the NUL is not there.
This fixes a bug in STACKSTRNUL() (that grew the stack) where: 1. STADJUST() called after a STACKSTRNUL() results in an improper adjust. This can be seen in ${var%pattern} and ${var%%pattern} evaluation. 2. Memory leak in STPUTC() called after a STACKSTRNUL().
Reviewed by: jilles
show more ...
|
#
88328642 |
| 14-Oct-2010 |
David E. O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org> |
In the spirit of r90111, depend on c89 and remove the "STATIC" macro and its usage.
|
#
aa7b6f82 |
| 13-Oct-2010 |
David E. O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org> |
Consistently use "STATIC" for all functions in order to be able to set breakpoints with in a debugger. And use naked "static" for variables.
Noticed by: bde
|
Revision tags: release/8.1.0_cvs, release/8.1.0, release/7.3.0_cvs, release/7.3.0 |
|
#
1a0fda2b |
| 04-Mar-2010 |
Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@FreeBSD.org> |
IFH@204581
|
#
9199c09a |
| 06-Jan-2010 |
Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org> |
Merge from head at r201628.
# This hasn't been tested, and there are at least three bad commits # that need to be backed out before the branch will be stable again.
|
#
2cac6e36 |
| 24-Dec-2009 |
Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@FreeBSD.org> |
sh: Constify various strings.
Most of this is adding const keywords, but setvar() in var.c had to be changed somewhat more.
|
Revision tags: release/8.0.0_cvs, release/8.0.0 |
|
#
10b3b545 |
| 17-Sep-2009 |
Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@FreeBSD.org> |
Merge from head
|
#
7e857dd1 |
| 12-Jun-2009 |
Oleksandr Tymoshenko <gonzo@FreeBSD.org> |
- Merge from HEAD
|
#
ac08b882 |
| 01-Jun-2009 |
Ralf S. Engelschall <rse@FreeBSD.org> |
be more type correct and align local ckmalloc() with its underlying malloc(3) by using a "size_t" instead of an "int" argument
|
Revision tags: release/7.2.0_cvs, release/7.2.0, release/7.1.0_cvs, release/7.1.0, release/6.4.0_cvs, release/6.4.0, release/7.0.0_cvs, release/7.0.0, release/6.3.0_cvs, release/6.3.0, release/6.2.0_cvs, release/6.2.0, release/5.5.0_cvs, release/5.5.0, release/6.1.0_cvs, release/6.1.0, release/6.0.0_cvs, release/6.0.0 |
|
#
670528cd |
| 28-Oct-2005 |
Stefan Farfeleder <stefanf@FreeBSD.org> |
Protect malloc, realloc and free calls with INT{ON,OFF} directly in chkalloc, ckrealloc and ckfree (added), respectively. sh jumps out of the signal handler using longjmp which is obviously a bad id
Protect malloc, realloc and free calls with INT{ON,OFF} directly in chkalloc, ckrealloc and ckfree (added), respectively. sh jumps out of the signal handler using longjmp which is obviously a bad idea during malloc calls.
Note: I think there is still a small race here because volatile sig_atomic_t only guarantees atomic reads and writes while we're doing increments and decrements.
Protect a setmode call with INT{ON,OFF} as it calls malloc internally.
PR: 45478 Patch from: Nate Eldredge
show more ...
|
Revision tags: release/5.4.0_cvs, release/5.4.0, release/4.11.0_cvs, release/4.11.0, release/5.3.0_cvs, release/5.3.0, release/4.10.0_cvs, release/4.10.0 |
|
#
6195fb41 |
| 06-Apr-2004 |
Mark Murray <markm@FreeBSD.org> |
Remove clause 3 from the UCB licenses.
OK'ed by: imp, core
|
Revision tags: release/5.2.1_cvs, release/5.2.1, release/5.2.0_cvs, release/5.2.0, release/4.9.0_cvs, release/4.9.0 |
|
#
2ba1b30b |
| 05-Jul-2003 |
Diomidis Spinellis <dds@FreeBSD.org> |
Changes following CScout analysis:
- Removed dead declarations - Made objects that should have been declared as static, static.
The changes use STATIC instead of static, following the existing conv
Changes following CScout analysis:
- Removed dead declarations - Made objects that should have been declared as static, static.
The changes use STATIC instead of static, following the existing convention in the rest of the code.
Approved by: schweikh (mentor) MFC after: 2 weeks
show more ...
|
Revision tags: release/5.1.0_cvs, release/5.1.0, release/4.8.0_cvs, release/4.8.0 |
|
#
caecb2f4 |
| 24-Feb-2003 |
Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@FreeBSD.org> |
Third attempt at removing machdep.h and using ALIGN from <sys/param.h>. The initial stack_block is staticly allocated and will be aligned according to the alignment requirements of pointers, which do
Third attempt at removing machdep.h and using ALIGN from <sys/param.h>. The initial stack_block is staticly allocated and will be aligned according to the alignment requirements of pointers, which does not necessarily match the alignment enforced by ALIGN. To solve this a more involved change is required: remove the static initial stack and deal with an initial condition of not having a stack at all. This change is therefore more risky than the previous ones, but unavoidable (other than not using the platform default alignment).
Discussed with: tjr Approved and reviewed by: tjr Tested on: alpha, i386, ia64 and sparc64
show more ...
|
#
b228ca4d |
| 18-Feb-2003 |
Tim J. Robbins <tjr@FreeBSD.org> |
Revert ALIGN change for the second and last time. I can't figure out why this is breaking sparc64.
|
#
decb00f6 |
| 17-Feb-2003 |
Tim J. Robbins <tjr@FreeBSD.org> |
Second attempt at removing machdep.h and using ALIGN from <sys/param.h>. The problem with the previous attempt, as noticed by Marcel, was that stacknxt was being aligned to a pointer boundary instead
Second attempt at removing machdep.h and using ALIGN from <sys/param.h>. The problem with the previous attempt, as noticed by Marcel, was that stacknxt was being aligned to a pointer boundary instead of an ALIGNBYTES + 1 boundary, which broke sparc64.
show more ...
|