Remove clause 3 from the UCB licenses.

OK'ed by: imp, core

Teach dd(1) about parity bits.

ssize_t is not required to be the same width as size_t by the
specs, so cast to intmax_t where appropriate.

Pointed out by: bde

Fixed (soon might be fatal) -Wformat warnings.

WARNS=4 fixes. This would be WARNS=9 if we were -std=99 instead of
-ansi, due to 'long long'.

Reviewed by: green (slightly earlier version)

Consistently use __FBSDID

Add semicolon to empty default case to silence warning.

Fix warnings inspired by lint, a commercial lint and WARNS=4.

Correct a logic bug that snuck in and broke multiplication of off_ts.

o __P has been reoved
o Old-style K&R declarations have been converted to new C89 style
o register has been removed
o prototype for main() has been removed (gcc3 makes it an error)
o int main(int arg

o __P has been reoved
o Old-style K&R declarations have been converted to new C89 style
o register has been removed
o prototype for main() has been removed (gcc3 makes it an error)
o int main(int argc, char *argv[]) is the preferred main definition.
o Attempt to not break style(9) conformance for declarations more than
they already are.

Approved by: arch@, new style(9)

show more ...

Commit general cleanups (separate get_num() and get_off_t() functions to
debogosify some of the command-line string-number conversions into
an unsigned and signed variant.)

Allow negative seek offsets for files that can be seeked upon. It
makes dd(1) a more complete "filter", even if this functionality is
limited to seekable streams.

Various cleanups are made to reduce warnings and make code prettier :)
Also, check for ftruncate() return value and die on failure, but only
try to ftruncate() when the file is a regular file.

Add iseek= and oseek= aliases for the preexisting skip= and seek=
operands. Can _YOU_ tell skip= and seek= apart with 100% accuracy
every time?

This also seems to make us option-for-option compatib

Add iseek= and oseek= aliases for the preexisting skip= and seek=
operands. Can _YOU_ tell skip= and seek= apart with 100% accuracy
every time?

This also seems to make us option-for-option compatible with the
Solaris dd(1).

Approved by: jkh
Suggested by: peter

show more ...

I've been Brucified! I did evil things with typedefs, but I'll do it
the correct (but less aesthetic) way, now. New lesson: correctness
and aestheticity may be mutually exclusive at times.

Brucifi

I've been Brucified! I did evil things with typedefs, but I'll do it
the correct (but less aesthetic) way, now. New lesson: correctness
and aestheticity may be mutually exclusive at times.

Brucified by: bde

show more ...

Do proper constification in args.c. This shuts up -Wcast-qual (thanks,
bfumerola for that pointer!) in GCC complaining about losing a const.

While I'm here, might as well mark in the Makefile that

Do proper constification in args.c. This shuts up -Wcast-qual (thanks,
bfumerola for that pointer!) in GCC complaining about losing a const.

While I'm here, might as well mark in the Makefile that I'm the
${MAINTAINER}. It seems like that's what everyone's doing these days.

show more ...

Make count=0 set cpy_cnt to -1, which is slight overloading, but makes
what I was trying to do work much better (ie at all. I could have sworn
it was working...) Fix a SEEK_SET to be SEEK_CUR, and m

Make count=0 set cpy_cnt to -1, which is slight overloading, but makes
what I was trying to do work much better (ie at all. I could have sworn
it was working...) Fix a SEEK_SET to be SEEK_CUR, and make Bruce's
lseek() test work correctly.

show more ...

Let count=-something fail, while count=0 may succeed, thus making dd(1)
useful as a seeking-tool as well as its many other uses. Previously,
dd(1) would succeed with count=0, but wouldn't get to the

Let count=-something fail, while count=0 may succeed, thus making dd(1)
useful as a seeking-tool as well as its many other uses. Previously,
dd(1) would succeed with count=0, but wouldn't get to the point that
blocks were to be read/written. This is a more useful behavior, and
this specific case doesn't seem to be handled by POSIX.

show more ...

Even more dd(1) cleanups! Thanks to Bruce for staying on my case until
we're done (not yet!) :)

Even more cleanups to dd(1). This is probably the culmination of the
BDEification process of dd(1). Most of the changes are from BDE's archive.
Support for negative offsets is gone again, but the cas

Even more cleanups to dd(1). This is probably the culmination of the
BDEification process of dd(1). Most of the changes are from BDE's archive.
Support for negative offsets is gone again, but the case where you
lseek() onto byte -1 of something from a negative offset using seek/skip
is fixed; if you end up on -1, you won't get a false positive lseek failure.
The biggest changes are to data types (more size_t, for instance) and
argument parsing. skip/seek on /dev/{,k}mem now occurs (instead of "read
until you reach the offset") due to mem devices now being D_DISK. Some
const things are now correctly declared as such, and the "case table"
building is better. The only thing that seems to be left to make dd(1)
everything TOG wants it to be is l10n.

show more ...

Make a bit more headway with dd's argument parsing, etc. get_bsz() is
renamed get_num() since it's not just about block sizes. skip and
seek can be any offset, including negative, now. Some style bog

Make a bit more headway with dd's argument parsing, etc. get_bsz() is
renamed get_num() since it's not just about block sizes. skip and
seek can be any offset, including negative, now. Some style bogons are fixed.

show more ...

$Id$ -> $FreeBSD$

This is the second round of dd(1) changes. Some changes made/reversed by
request of Bruce. More changes may follow later. 'g' multiplier has
been added (i.e. dd seek=5g if=bigfile.) Some minor correc

This is the second round of dd(1) changes. Some changes made/reversed by
request of Bruce. More changes may follow later. 'g' multiplier has
been added (i.e. dd seek=5g if=bigfile.) Some minor corrections were made
as well.

Noticed by: bde

show more ...

Miscellaneous dd(1) changes: mainly fixing variable types (size_t, ssize_t,
off_t, int, u_int64_t, etc.). dd(1) should now work properly with REALLY
big amounts of data.

Various spelling/formatting changes.

Submitted by: Philippe Charnier <charnier@xp11.frmug.org>