#
4d846d26 |
| 10-May-2023 |
Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org> |
spdx: The BSD-2-Clause-FreeBSD identifier is obsolete, drop -FreeBSD
The SPDX folks have obsoleted the BSD-2-Clause-FreeBSD identifier. Catch up to that fact and revert to their recommended match of
spdx: The BSD-2-Clause-FreeBSD identifier is obsolete, drop -FreeBSD
The SPDX folks have obsoleted the BSD-2-Clause-FreeBSD identifier. Catch up to that fact and revert to their recommended match of BSD-2-Clause.
Discussed with: pfg MFC After: 3 days Sponsored by: Netflix
show more ...
|
#
51015e6d |
| 31-Oct-2022 |
Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> |
csu: move common code to libc
Why? Most trivial point, it shaves around 600 bytes from the dynamic binaries on amd64. Less trivial, the removed code is no longer part of the ABI, and we can ship upd
csu: move common code to libc
Why? Most trivial point, it shaves around 600 bytes from the dynamic binaries on amd64. Less trivial, the removed code is no longer part of the ABI, and we can ship updates to it with libc updates. Right now most of the csu is linked into the binaries and require us to do somewhat tricky ABI compat when it needs to change. For instance, the init_array change would be much simpler and does not require note tagging if we have init calling code in libc.
This could be improved more, by splitting dynamic and static initialization. For instance, &_DYNAMIC tests can be removed then. Such change, nonetheless, would require building libc three times. I left this for later, after this change stabilizes, if ever.
Reviewed by: markj Discussed with: jrtc27 (some objections, see the review), imp Tested by: markj (aarch64) Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation MFC after: 3 weeks Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D37220
show more ...
|